Disposed

Mayank Kumar Sharma S/O Late Shri Dr. S.B. Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 Sept 2025CW/14114/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the cancellation of the petitioner's Architect certificate, directing him to approach authorities for representation within a week after which the authorities must decide the matter following due process of law.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to submit representation to respondent authorities within one week for decision on merits following due process of law.

Mayank Kumar Sharma S/O Late Shri Dr. S.B. Sharma… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:37623]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14114/2025

¶4

Mayank Kumar Sharma S/o Late Shri Dr. S.B. Sharma, Aged About 45 Years, R/o 82, Shivram Colony, Jagatpura, Jaipur (Raj).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Rajasthan, Through Deputy Secretary-I, Urban Development Department, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Jaipur Greater, Pandit Dindayal Uppadhyay Bhawan, Tonk Road, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Raj) 302015

¶9

Chief Town Planner, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, J.L.N. Marg, Opposite Birla Mandir, Rambagh, Jaipur (Raj).

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Manish Kumar Sharma
For Respondent(s)	:

¶12

JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

¶13

Order

¶14

16/09/2025

¶15

Aggrieved by the order dated 01.09.2025, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing the instant writ petition.

¶16

Counsel for the petitioner submits that without issuing any notice and without following the due process of law as contained under Regulation 9 of the Model Rajasthan (Urban Area) Building Byelaws, 2025, the certificate of the petitioner for working as an Architect has been cancelled. Counsel submits that by doing so, the respondents have violated the principles of natural justice.

[2025:RJ-JP:37623]

[CW-14114/2025]

(2 of 2)

Considering the aforesaid, the instant writ petition stands disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent authorities and submit appropriate representation against the order impugned within a period of one week from today. It is expected from the respondent authorities to decide the same strictly in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and after following the due process of law as contained under Regulation 9 of the Model Rajasthan (Urban Area) Building Bye-laws, 2025.

¶21

Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶22

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

¶23

Ashu/43

Mayank Kumar Sharma S/O Late Shri Dr. S.B. Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mayank Kumar Sharma S/O Late Shri Dr. S.B. Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kuldeep S/O Nanga Mali Vs State of Rajasthan

Narendra Kumar Mittal S/O Shri Kailash Chand Mittal Vs Ajiz Gaur S/O Shri Nizamuddin

Jai Bhawani Enterprises Vs Au Small Finance Bank Ltd.

Mohammad Sarfaraj S/O Shri Kamruddin Rangrej, Vs State of Rajasthan

Jahavi Sharma D/O Naresh Sharma Vs Board of Secondary Education

Monika Kumari D/O Shri Shishram Vs Rajasthan University of Health Sciences