Writ petition under Article 226 by a couple seeking protection from private respondents was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioners on multiple dates and they appeared to have lost interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:3467]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 2120/2023
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : None |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP |
(2 of 2)
[2025:RJ-JP:3467]
[CRLW-2120/2023]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order
23/01/2025
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J
AARZOO ARORA /81
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking protection from private respondents should be continued when petitioners failed to appear.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Tanu Kumari Mehra
Rajesh Mehra
State of Rajasthan
The Director General of Police, Jaipur
Superintendent of Police, Jaipur Rural
Dy. Commissioner of Police, Jaipur South
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
