Disposed

Pratigya Bunkar D/O Hari Prasad Bunkar, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC22 Jan 2025CRLW/101/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Adult couple in a live-in relationship sought police protection from respondents threatening them, including petitioner's family members opposing the relationship and attempting to force marriage elsewhere. Court applied principles from Suman Meena case and directed petitioners to file representation before SP Sikar for life and liberty protection.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioners to submit representation before SP Sikar; SP to ensure no threat to petitioners' life and liberty.

Pratigya Bunkar D/O Hari Prasad… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:3236]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 101/2025

¶4

Pratigya Bunkar D/o Hari Prasad Bunkar, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Ward No.01, Indra Colony, Raipur, Jageer Raipur, Neem Ka Thana, Sikar, Rajasthan At Present R/o Ward No. 06, Village Gordhanpura, Neem Ka Thana, Sikar, Rajasthan. .

¶5

Ashish Kumar S/o Lal Chand, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Ward No. 06, Village Gordhanpura, Neem Ka Thana, Sikar, Rajasthan.

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶9

Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur.

¶10

Inspector General Of Police, Jaipur Range, Jaipur, Banipark, Jaipur.

¶11

Superintendent Of Police, Office Of Superintendent Of Police, Sikar.

¶12

Superintendent Of Police, Office Of Superintendent Of Police, Neem Ka Thana.

¶13

Deputy Superintendent Of Police Cum Nodal Officer, District Sikar.

¶14

Additional Superintendent Of Police Cum Nodal Officer, District Neem Ka Thana.

¶15

Additional Director General Of Police, Civil Rights, Rajasthan, Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur.

¶16

Station House Officer, Police Station Neem Ka Thana, Sikar.

¶17

Sanjay Binawat S/o Prahlad, R/o Kalwa Ki Dhani, Neem Ka Thana, Sikar.

¶18

Pradeep Kumar S/o Sh. Phoolchand, R/o Raipur Jagir, Sikar

¶19

Moti Verma S/o Hariram, R/o Raipur Jagir, Sikar.

¶20

Shankar S/o Unknown, R/o Near Shyam Mandir, Neem Ka Thana, Sikar.

(2 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:3236]

[CRLW-101/2025]

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Ripunjay Sharma, Adv.
	Mrs. Pratigya Bunkar & Mr. Ashish
	Kumar(petitioners inperson)
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat,P.P.

¶26

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR

¶27

Order

¶28

22/01/2025

¶29

1- jftLVªh }kjk crkbZ xbZ dfe;ksa dks ekQ fd;k tkrk gSA

¶30

2- ;kphx.k }kjk ;g fjV ;kfpdk Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 226 ds

¶31

rgr] vizkFkhZ la[;k&10 yxk;r 13 ls lqj{kk pkgus gsrq izLrqr dh xbZ gSA vizkFkhZ la[;k&10 yxk;r 13 ls ;kphx.k ds thou o Lora=rk dks [krjs dh vk'kadk gSA

¶32

3- ;kphx.k e; vf/koDrk mifLFkr] ftudh f'kuk[r muds vf/koDrk }kjk dh xbZA

¶33

4- fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k ;kphx.k dk rdZ jgk gS fd i=koyh ij miyC/k ;kph la[;k&1 izfrKk jktdh; ckfydk mPp izkFkfed fo|ky;] jk;iqj dh vadrkfydk dh QksVksizfr vuqyXud&1 ds eqrkfcd ;kph la[;k&1 dh tUefrfFk 01-08-2005 gS rFkk i=koyh ij miyC/k ;kph la[;k&2 vk'kh"k dqekj dh izkFkfed f'k{kk vf/kxe LRkj ewY;kadu xzsfMax ;qDr izek.k&i= vuqyXud&2 dh QksVksizfr ds eqrkfcd ;kph la[;k&2 vk'kh"k dqekj dh tUefrfFk 04-11-2005 gS] ftlds vuqlkj nksuksa gh ;kphx.k ckfyx gSa rFkk Lo;a dh ethZ ls fyo&bu&fjys’kuf’ki esa jg jgs gSa] fdUrq vizkFkhZ la[;k&10 yxk;r 13] tks fd ;kph la[;k&1 ds ifjokjtu gSa rFkk ;kph la[;k&1 dk fookg mldh bPNk ds fo#) tcjnLrh vU;= djuk pkgrs gSaA bl izdkj vizkFkhZ la[;k&10 yxk;r 13 ls ;kphx.k dks lqj{kk iznku djokbZ tkosA

(3 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:3236]

[CRLW-101/2025]

5- bl U;k;ky; dh leUo; ihB }kjk S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No.792/2024 titled as Suman Meena & Anr. Vs. State of

¶38

Rajasthan & Ors. esa fnukad 02-08-2024 dks fu.kZ; ikfjr dj jkT; ljdkj dks fn'kk&funsZ'k nsrs gq, mDr fjV ;kfpdk fuLrkj.k fd;k x;k gSA bl izdkj Suman Meena (supra) ds ekeys esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr bl ekeys esa iwjh rjg ls ykxw gksrs gSaA

¶39

6- pwafd ;kphx.k ckfyx gSa vkSj os LosPN;k ls fyo&bu&fjys’kuf’ki esa jgdj viuk 'kkafriwoZd thou;kiu dj jgs gSa rFkk ;kph la[;k&1 ds ifjokjtu] mldh bPNk ds fo#) mldk fookg dgha vU;= djuk pkgrs gSa] bl dkj.k vizkFkhZ la[;k&10 yxk;r 13 ls ;kphx.k ds thou o Lora=rk dks [krjs dh vk’kadk gSaA ,slh fLFkfr esa Suman Meena (supra) ds ekeys esa izfrikfnr fl)kUrksa dh jks'kuh esa mDr fjV ;kfpdk Lohdkj djrs gq, ;g vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;kphx.k vius thou o Lora=rk dh lqj{kk gsrq vizkFkhZ la[;k&4 iqfyl v/kh{kd] lhdj ds le{k izR;kosnu izLrqr djsaA mDr izR;kosnu izLrqr gksus ij vizkFkhZ la[;k&4 iqfyl v/kh{kd] lhdj bl ckr dks lqfuf'pr djsaxs fd ;kphx.k ds thou o Lora=rk dks dksbZ [krjk mRiUu uk gksA

¶40

7- bl funsZ'k ds lkFk mDr fjV ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k fd;k tkrk gSA 8- LFkxu izkFkZuk&i= o yafcr izkFkZuk&i=ksa dks Hkh mijksDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶41

9- bl vkns'k ls i{kdkjku ds e/; 'kq: dh xbZ vU; dkuwuh dk;Zokfg;ksa ij dksbZ izfrdwy izHkko ugha iMsxkA

¶42

(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J

¶43

LOKESH RAJ /309

Pratigya Bunkar D/O Hari Prasad Bunkar, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pratigya Bunkar D/O Hari Prasad Bunkar, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhagwan Sahay Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Ramkishan S/O Shri Narsanga B/C Meena Vs Raji Devi D/O Shri Narayan B/C Meena

Shyamsunder Vs State of Raj and Anr.

Amit Mittal S/O Sh. Sanjay Mittal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil Kacholiya S/O Sh. Gangadas Kacholiya, Vs State of Rajasthan

Taruna Agrawal W/O Sh. Rakesh Agrawal, Vs State of Rajasthan