Partly allowed

Banwari Lal v. State of Raj.

Rajasthan HC21 May 2025CRLR/212/2005

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Revision against conviction under Sections 279 and 304 IPC. Conviction upheld but sentence modified to the period already undergone, conditioned on depositing the imposed fine within sixty days, failing which the original fine sentence would revive.

What did the court decide?

Conviction maintained; sentence modified to period already undergone, conditional on deposit of fine within 60 days.

Banwari Lal Vs State of Raj. — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:21463]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 212/2005

¶4

Banwari Lal son of Shri Mangoo Ram, Resident of Laka, Police Station Petni, District Sikar (Petitioner is in custody at Central Jail, Jaipur)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan through P.P.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naveen Kumar Khaparwal, Adv. for Mr. Raj Kumar Kasana, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Judgment / Order

¶12

21/05/2025

¶13

;kph@vfHk;qDr cuokjhyky ¼vkxs vfHk;qDr dgk tk,xk½ dks fo}ku U;kf;d eftLVªsV] t;iqj ftyk t;iqj }kjk fu;fer vkijkf/kd izdj.k la[;k 109 @1984 esa fnukad 07-03-2000 dks ikfjr fu.kZ; ds ek/;e ls /kkjk 279] 304 , Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds vijk/k esa nks"kfl) djkj nsrs gq, /kkjk 279 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds vijk/k ds fy, nks ekg ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl o ikap lkS :i;s ds vFkZn.M ,oa vFkZn.M vnk ugha djus ij 15 fnu ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl o /kkjk 304, Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds vijk/k ds fy, Ng ekg ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl o iUnzg lkS :i;s ds vFkZn.M ,oa vFkZn.M vnk ugha djus ij ,d ekg ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl ls nafMr fd;k x;k] ftlds fo:) vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr nkafMd vihy la[;k 08 @2000 fo}ku ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] t;iqj ftyk t;iqj }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 18-02-2005 ds ek/;e ls [kkfjt djrs gq, fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds nks"kflf) o n.Mkns'k ds fu.kZ; dh iqf"V dh x;h] ftlls O;fFkr gksdj vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk izLrqr dh x;h gSA

[CRLR-212/2005]

[2025:RJ-JP:21463]

(2 of 3)

;|fi vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk nks"kflf) o n.Mkns'k ds fu.kZ; ds fo:) izLrqr dh x;h gS] ysfdu nkSjkus cgl fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr dk fuosnu gS fd os nks"kflf) ds fu.kZ; dks xq.knks"kksa ij pqukSrh ugha nsrs gSa rFkk fuxjkuh ;kfpdk dks ek= n.Mkns'k dh lhek rd lhfer j[krs gq, fuosnu fd;k fd ?kVuk fnukad 05-05-84 dh gksdj djhc 31 o"kZ iqjkuh gS] ?kVuk ds le; vfHk;qDr uo;qod Fkk] vfHk;qDr djhc nks ekg dh ltk Hkqxr pqdk gS] vr% mnkjrk dk :[k viukrs gq, mls Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk ij NksMs tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶18

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk fopkj.k o vihyh; U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; dks fof/klEer gksuk crkrs gq, mls ;Fkkor j[ks tkus o fuxjkuh ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶19

nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA

¶20

vfHk;qDr bl izdj.k esa fopkj.k ds nkSjku 07 fnu o fnukad 18-02-05 ls 07-04-05 rd djhc ,d ekg 27 fnu rd vfHkj{kk esa jg pqdk gSA vfHk;qDr ds fo:) dksbZ iwoZ nks"kflf) ;k vkijkf/kd fjdksMZ dk rF; vfHkys[k ij ugha gS] ekeyk eftLVªsV U;k;ky; }kjk fopkj.kh; gSA vfHk;qDr ?kVuk ds le; uo;qod Fkk] ?kVuk 31 o"kZ iqjkuh gS] vfHk;qDr yacs le; rd vUoh{kk dh osnuk Hkqxr pqdk gS] vr% laiw.kZ ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks ns[krs gq, vfHk;qDr dks Hkqxrh gqbZ dkjkokl dh vof/k rd n.Mkns'k ekurs gq, NksMk tkuk mfpr gSA

¶21

mijksDrkuqlkj vihyk/khu fu.kZ; ds ek/;e ls tks nks"kflf) dh x;h gS] mls ;Fkkor j[kk tkrk gS] ysfdu n.Mkns'k dks mikUrfjr djrs gq, vfHk;qDr dks Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk vFkkZr n.Mkns'k ?kVkrs gq, Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk ij NksMs tkus dk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gSA

¶22

vfHk;qDr }kjk ;fn vf/kjksfir vFkZn.M dh jkf'k tek ugha djk;h x;h gS rks 60 fnu esa tek djkus dk vkns'k fn;k tkrk gSA ;fn mDr vof/k esa vFkZn.M dh jkf'k tek ugha djk;h tkrh gS rks vfHk;qDr dks

¶23

[2025:RJ-JP:21463] (3 of 3) [CRLR-212/2005]

¶24

fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vFkZn.M ds O;frdze ds laca/k esa ikfjr n.Mkns'k Hkqxruk gksxkA

¶25

QyLo:i] vfHk;qDr@fuxjkuhdrkZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj dj fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA bl fu.kZ; dh izfr ds lkFk v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk vfHkys[k vfoyEc izsf"kr fd;k tkosA

¶26

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶27

Murari Lal Sharma /1

Banwari Lal v. State of Raj.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Banwari Lal v. State of Raj.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Asif S/O Khurshid Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunil Hankhla S/O Ramdev Gurjar Vs the State of Rajasthan

Dharmveer Yadav S/O Jagdish Prasad Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Babu Lal Sharma Vs State

Kamil @ Rashid Vs State

Kamlesh Kumar Vs State