The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of a bail application. Considering the delay in trial and inability to present evidence due to confinement, the petitioners were granted bail on bail bonds.
Petition for bail was allowed and the accused persons were set at liberty on bail bonds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:21204]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3500/2025
----Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : | Mr. Pradhuman Singh Rathore, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Singh Nirwan, Adv. |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : | Mr. N S Dhakad, PP |
| Mr. Sanjay Gangwar, Adv. |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
20/05/2025
izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh /kkjk 483 ch ,u ,l ,l@ /kkjk 439 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk xsxy] vtesj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 212@24 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 189¼2½] 115¼2½] 126¼2½] 109¼1½] 304¼2½] 351¼2½] 111¼2½¼ch½] 324¼2½] 117¼2½¼3½ ch ,u ,l esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA
izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gS] vkgr ds dksbZ pksV izk.k?kkrd ugha gS] izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k fnukad 29-01-25 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] izdj.k esa ckn vuqla/kku vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS] izdj.k ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxsxk]
[2025:RJ-JP:21204]
[CRLMB-3500/2025]
(2 of 2)
vr% izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkus ,oa mls tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd o fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh us izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;k ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA
gLrxr ekeys esa orZeku vfHk;qDrx.k ij vkgr ds lkFk ?kkrd gfFk;kjksa ls ekjihV dj tkuysok geyk dkfjr djrs gq, gR;k ds iz;kl dk vkjksi gSA ;|fi vkgr ds xaHkhj pksV iako ds vfLFkHkax dh gS] ysfdu vkgr ds flj esa Hkh lkjoku pksVsa vkbZ gSA vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk lqfu;ksftr rjhds ls vkgr ds lkFk ekjihV dj vkard iSnk djus dk vk'k; jgk gSA vfHk;qDr lquhy gkadyk ij 15 rFkk vfHk;qDr eksuw xqtZj ij 13 vkijkf/kd izdj.k] tks xaHkhj vijk/kksa ls lacaf/kr gS] igys ls gh lafLFkr gks j[ks gSaA ,sls vkijkf/kd izo`fRr okys O;fDr dks ;fn tekur ij fjgk fd;k x;k rks os xokgku dks Mjk /kedkdj foijhr :i ls izHkkfor dj ldrs gSa] bl laHkkouk ls badkj ugha fd;k tk ldrkA vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) yxk;s x;s vkjksi vR;f/kd xaHkhj gS] ,sls xaHkhj ekeyksa esa fu"i{k fopkj.k vko';d gSA
izdj.k esa miyC/k leLr rF;kRed fLFkfr rFkk izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa ,oa vijk/k dh XkaHkhjrk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds bl izdze ij xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k lquhy gkadyk iq= jkenso xqtZj o eksuw xqtZj iq= ukjk;.k xqtZj dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= vLohdkj dj [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA
( UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
Murari Lal Sharma /91
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to accused persons facing charges under Section 302 and other sections of the IPC.
Whether the High Court can grant interim bail during the course of trial.
Sunil Hankhla
Monu Gurjar
The State Of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
