Allowed

Asif S/O Khurshid v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 May 2025CRLMB/4111/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Held in judicial custody for a long period, two petitioners filed bail applications under Section 483 BNSS in a case involving BNS offences. The High Court, noting the filing of the charge sheet and the delay in trial proceedings deemed it just and proper to allow bail by enlarging the petitioners on bond.

What did the court decide?

Accused-petitioners shall be released on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

Asif S/O Khurshid Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:21293]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4110/2025

¶4

Rahul S/o Dilawar @ Dhillu Khan, R/o Lapala, Police Station Tijara, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) (At Present In Sub Jail, Tijara).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4111/2025 Asif S/o Khurshid, R/o Arandka, Police Station Tijara, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) (At Present In Sub Jail, Tijara)

¶11

----Petitioner

¶12

Versus

¶13

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶14

----Respondent

¶15

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh Sunda, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, P.P.

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶17

20/05/2025

¶18

These bail applications have been filed by petitioners under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No.104/2025 registered at Police Station Tijara, District Bhiwadi (Raj.) for the offence(s) under Section(s) 319(2), 318(4), 316(2) & 61(2) of BNS.

¶19

Learned counsel for petitioners submits that accusedpetitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in these cases. Learned counsel further submits that charge sheet has been filed. Learned counsel also submits that accused-

[2025:RJ-JP:21293]

[CRLMB-4110/2025]

(2 of 2)

petitioners have been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence petitioners may be enlarged on bail.

¶24

Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed these bail applications.

¶25

Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of these cases and the fact that charge sheet has been filed, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of these cases, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge petitioners on bail.

¶26

Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 483 BNSS/439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is ordered that accusedpetitioners 1.Rahul S/o Dilawar @ Dhillu Khan & 2.Asif S/o Khurshid shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶27

A copy of this order be placed in the connected file.

¶28

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶29

DANISH USMANI /117 & 118

Asif S/O Khurshid v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Asif S/O Khurshid v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Rekha Verma Wife of Shri Mahendra Kumar Verma Vs State of Rajasthan

Saleem S/O Kasam Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Ritu @ Juli Agrawal D/O Shri Chandra Prakash Gupta Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunil Hankhla S/O Ramdev Gurjar Vs the State of Rajasthan

Dharmveer Yadav S/O Jagdish Prasad Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Naresh Kumar S/O Late Ratiram Vs State of Rajasthan