Disposed¶23

Ghanshyam Singh S/O Sardar Singh, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC20 Nov 2025CRLMP/7220/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Fair and impartial investigation directions; FIR No.56/2025, P.S. Banipark, Jaipur (West), dated 02.05.2025; Section 200 Cr.P.C.; status report of investigation; Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P., 2008 (2) SCC 409; Public Prosecutor opposed noting matter still at investigation stage; petition, stay and pending applications disposed of; S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.7220/2025; Rajasthan High Court Jaipur Bench; Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand; order dated 20/11/2025.

What did the court decide?

No direct supervisory directions were issued; the petitioner was granted liberty to move an application under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before the court concerned to get the status report of the investigation, and the criminal misc. petition along with stay application and pending applications stood disposed of. ¶23

Ghanshyam Singh S/O Sardar Singh, Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶23

Issue for consideration

Whether directions should be issued for a fair, proper and impartial investigation in FIR No.56/2025 registered at Police Station Banipark, District Jaipur (West), on the petitioner's allegation that the police are not proceeding fairly.

¶15

Court's answer

Since the FIR was registered in May, 2025, the Court held that the petitioner is at liberty to move an application under Section 200 Cr.P.C., in pursuance of the directions of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P. (2008) 2 SCC 409, before the court concerned to obtain the status report of the investigation.

¶21

Ratio / Principle

If the petitioner submits such an application before the trial court, the court concerned shall pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law.

¶22

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench), single judge Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand, disposed of a criminal miscellaneous petition in which the petitioner sought directions for a fair, proper and impartial investigation in FIR No.56/2025 registered at Police Station Banipark, District Jaipur (West), alleging that despite registration of the FIR on 02.05.2025 the police was not proceeding fairly. Observing that the matter remained at the investigation stage, the Court held the petitioner at liberty to move an application under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before the court concerned, in pursuance of the Supreme Court's directions in Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P., 2008 (2) SCC 409, to obtain the status report of the investigation, with the court concerned to pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law. The petition, stay application and other pending applications were disposed of accordingly.

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:46954]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.7220/2025

¶4

Ghanshyam Singh S/o Sardar Singh, R/o E-32, Janpath, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶8

The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate, Govt. Hostel, M.i. Road, Jaipur.

¶9

The Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur ( West). 5. The Station House Officer, Police Station Banipark, District Jaipur (West).

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Anil Kumar Jain
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Amit Punia,PP

¶12

JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

¶13

Order

¶14

20/11/2025

¶15

The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking directions for fair, proper and impartial investigation in FIR No.56/2025 registered with Police Station Banipark, District Jaipur (West).

¶16

As per the pleadings of the misc. petition that the FIR was registered against the accused person on 02.05.2025, but the Police is not proceeding in a fair and proper manner, so appropriate directions be issued to the Investigating Officer for conducting a fair and impartial investigation.

[2025:RJ-JP:46954]

[CRLMP-7220/2025]

(2 of 2)

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer and submits that the matter is still at investigation stage and it will take its own time & motion, so directions sought for should not be granted.

¶21

Looking to the fact that the FIR has been registered in the month of May, 2025, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is at liberty to move an application under Section 200 Cr.P.C., in pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State Of U.P. And Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409 , before the court concerned to get the status report of the investigation.

¶22

In case, any application, as mentioned above, is submitted by the petitioner before the trial court, appropriate orders shall be passed by the court concerned strictly in accordance with law.

¶23

With the aforesaid observations, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of.

¶24

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

¶25

Karan/46

Ghanshyam Singh S/O Sardar Singh, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ghanshyam Singh S/O Sardar Singh, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Raghvendra Gupta S/O Shri Brajendra Gupta, Vs State of Rajasthan

Banwari Lal Son of Shri Geegaram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Sarswati Rao W/O Jagdish Prasad Rao Vs the State of Rajasthan

Alekh Sharma Son of Late Shri Chetan Prakash Sharma, Vs Aditya Build Developers Private Limited

Nitesh Khichar Son of Shri Subhash Khichar, Vs the State of Rajasthan

Indra Sevaram Rabari D/O Sevaram Rabari, Vs the State of Rajasthan