Dismissed¶24

Sarswati Rao W/O Jagdish Prasad Rao v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC19 Nov 2025CRLMP/1504/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench; CRLMP 1504/2023 (S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition); eight petitioners (Rao family members, Ajmer/Bhilwara) versus State of Rajasthan and Hemant; petition dismissed for want of prosecution after years of pendency on the defect side without curing defects; pending applications also dismissed; liberty to seek revival preserved; single-judge order by Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand dated 19/11/2025; no statute or precedent discussed.

What did the court decide?

Liberty reserved to the petitioners to move an application for revival of the petition, in case any cause of action or grievance still survives. ¶24

Sarswati Rao W/O Jagdish Prasad Rao Vs the State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1504/2023

¶3

Sarswati Rao W/o Jagdish Prasad Rao, Aged About 61 Years, Resident Of New Krishana Nagar, Ward No. 1, Police Station Kekari City, District Ajmer (Raj.)

¶4

Jagdish Prasad Rao S/o Shri Moti Lal, Aged About 70 Years, Resident Of New Krishana Nagar, Ward No. 1, Police Station Kekari City, District Ajmer (Raj.)

¶5

Gaurav Kumar Rao S/o Jagdish Prasad Rao, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of New Krishana Nagar, Ward No. 1, Police Station Kekari City, District Ajmer (Raj.)

¶6

Bharti Rao W/o Gaurav Kumar Rao, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of New Krishana Nagar, Ward No. 1, Police Station Kekari City, District Ajmer (Raj.)

¶7

Umesh Kumar Rao S/o Jagdish Prasad Rao, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of New Krishana Nagar, Ward No. 1, Police Station Kekari City, District Ajmer (Raj.)

¶8

Dwarika Rao W/o Sandeep Kumar Rao, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of New Krishana Nagar, Ward No. 1, Police Station Kekari City, District Ajmer (Raj.)

¶9

Sandeep Kumar Rao S/o Jagdish Prasad Rao, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of New Krishana Nagar, Ward No. 1, Police Station Kekari City, District Ajmer (Raj.)

¶10

Mamta Rao D/o Ratan Lal Rao, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Sanjay Nagar, Subhash Nagar, Bhilwara (Raj.)

¶11

----Petitioners

¶12

Versus

¶13

The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Public Prosecutor.

¶14

Hemant S/o Shri Shankar Lal, R/o Shastri Nagar, Ajmer Road, Kekari, Ajmer (Rajasthan).

----Respondents

(2 of 2)

[CRLMP-1504/2023]

For Petitioner(s)	: Nonepresent
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Vivek Choudhary,PP

¶19

JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

¶20

Order

¶21

19/11/2025

¶22

This petition is lying pending before this Court in defect side for last several years and no steps have been taken by the counsel for the petitioners to cure the defect(s).

¶23

It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting this matter and they have lost interest in pursuing this matter.

¶24

In view of the above, the instant criminal misc. petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. Pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.

¶25

However, the petitioners would be at liberty to move application for revival of this petition, in case, any cause of action or grievance still survives.

¶26

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

¶27

KuD/176

Sarswati Rao W/O Jagdish Prasad Rao v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sarswati Rao W/O Jagdish Prasad Rao v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sundar Singh Son of Shri Nand Ram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Parmanand S/O Sukhlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Rukhsana Bano Wife of Shri Mohammed Aslam, Vs Mohammed Aslam Son of Shri Mohammed Salam

Dr. Raghvendra Gupta S/O Shri Brajendra Gupta, Vs State of Rajasthan

Banwari Lal Son of Shri Geegaram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Abdul Rahim Son of Latoor Vs Rajnibala Wife of Chandraprakash