Disposed¶22

Girish Kumar Parik S/O Surendra Kumar Parik, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Dec 2025CRLMP/4904/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Fair, proper and impartial investigation; FIR No. 105/2024; Police Station Chaksu, District Jaipur City (South); FIR dated 15.03.2024; Section 200 Cr.P.C.; status report of investigation; Sakiri Vasu Vs. State Of U.P. And Others; 2008 (2) SCC 409; CRLMP-4904/2025; S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition; Rajasthan High Court Jaipur Bench; Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand; petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to move an application under Section 200 Cr.P.C. before the court concerned to get the status report of the investigation, with the trial court to pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law; the criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. ¶22

Girish Kumar Parik S/O Surendra Kumar Parik, Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4904/2025

¶3

Girish Kumar Parik S/o Surendra Kumar Parik, Resident Of C-120/121, Anand Vihar, Railway Colony, Jagatpura , Pratap Nagar, Jaipur City East, Jaipur.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶7

Director General Of Police, Phq, Lal Kothi, Jaipur.

¶8

Commissioner Of Police, Commissionerate, Govt. Hostel, Jaipur (Raj).

¶9

Sho Police Station, Chaksu, District Jaipur South, (Raj).

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umesh Shringi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary-PP

¶12

JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

¶13

Order

¶14

03/12/2025

¶15

The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking directions for fair, proper and impartial investigation in FIR No. 105/2024 registered with Police Station Chaksu District Jaipur City (South).

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an FIR was registered against the accused person on 15.03.2024, but the Police is not proceeding in a fair and proper manner, so appropriate directions be issued to the Investigating Officer for conducting a fair and impartial investigation.

¶17

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer and submits that the matter is still at investigation stage and it will

¶18

[CRLMP-4904/2025]

¶19

(2 of 2)

¶20

take its own time & motion, so directions sought for should not be granted.

¶21

Looking to the fact that the FIR has been registered in the month of March, 2024, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is at liberty to move an application under Section 200 Cr.P.C., in pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State Of U.P. And Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409 , before the court concerned to get the status report of the investigation.

¶22

In case, any application, as mentioned above, is submitted by the petitioner before the trial court, appropriate orders shall be passed by the court concerned strictly in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid observations, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of.

¶23

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

¶24

Ashu/96

Girish Kumar Parik S/O Surendra Kumar Parik, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Girish Kumar Parik S/O Surendra Kumar Parik, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kallo W/O Khushiram, Vs Sate of Rajasthan

Indrajeet Singh Nagar S/O Shri Houtiram Nagar, Vs State of Rajasthan

Vinod Son of Shri Shyam Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan

Raghav Singh Vs State of Raj and Anr.

Anita Goyal Wife Yeshwant Goyal, Vs Dharmchand Chatar, Son of Surajmal Chatar

Pankaj Dhirendra S/O Shri Sanwarmal Dharendra, Vs State of Rajasthan