Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR registered on allegations of land encroachment and assault on a removal team, claiming an SDO who passed a status quo order later lodged the FIR. The court declined to assess the FIR's genuineness at this stage and permitted representation to the investigating officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar Jangid For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia-PP
[CRLMP-6795/2024]
(2 of 3)
Ms. Arti Sharma-PP
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order
02/12/2025
[CRLMP-6795/2024]
(3 of 3)
the same Police Station, however, the police are not taking any steps towards investigating the aforesaid FIR but are bent upon to take action against the petitioners in the impugned FIR. Hence interference of this Court is warranted.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
Ashu/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether FIR No. 322/2024 against the petitioners alleging encroachment and assault on officials should be quashed under Section 528 BNSS.
7 provisions across 3 enactments
Kallo
Neema
Hema
Prem
Sapna
Hargalli
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
