Petitioner sought withdrawal of the criminal miscellaneous petition after arguing for a while; the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, clarifying no prejudice would be caused to the petitioner on account of the withdrawal.
Permission to withdraw granted; no prejudice to petitioner from withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:19460]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2089/2025
Rameshwar Sharma S/o Shri Chunnilal Sharma, R/o B-31, Varun Colony, Near V.t. Road, Golyawas, Mansarovar, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment
08/05/2025
After arguing for while, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Howsoever, it is clarified that no prejudice will be caused to the petitioner on account of said withdrawal.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
DEEPAK/28
Rameshwar Sharma S/o Shri Chunnilal Sharma
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
Mukesh Choudhary S/o Shri Gopal Choudhary
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
