Petition to quash FIR over a settled private contractual dispute. Relying on Gian Singh and Ramgopal, the court held that amicable settlement justified quashing and set aside the FIR with consequential proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:19337]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1330/2021
Ess Kay Fincoro Ltd., Through Its Authorised Signatory Mamta Kanwar Having Its Registered Office At G-1, G-2, New Market, Khasa Kothi Circle, 302001.
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
----Complainant/Respondent
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment
07/05/2025
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-1330/2021]
[2025:RJ-JP:19337]
(SAMEER JAIN),J
GAURAV/99
1 issue framed by the court
Can an FIR for a private, contractual dispute settled by compromise be quashed under inherent powers despite non-compoundable offences?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Singh Vs. State of PunjabRelied on¶4
(2012) 10 SCC 303 · Who else cites this
Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya PradeshRelied on¶4
2022 (14) SCC 531 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ess Kay Fincoro Ltd. through its authorised signatory Mamta Kanwar
State of Rajasthan
Prem Singh
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
