Sureties challenged orders for auction of their attached agricultural land after the accused on whose bail they stood absconded and a penalty was imposed under Section 446(3) CrPC. The High Court found no procedural error or illegality in the impugned order and declined interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:46484]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1694/2021
Kamal Son Of Salema, Resident Of Jodhpur Ubhaka, Tehsil Pahari, Bharatpur (Raj).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1691/2021
Asfak Son Of Hasan, Resident Of Jodhpur, Tehsil Pahari, Jodhpur, Ubhaka, Bharatpur Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Kumar Vairagi, Adv. for Mr. Surendra Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order
18/11/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:46484]
[CRLMP-1694/2021]
(2 of 3)
[2025:RJ-JP:46484]
[CRLMP-1694/2021]
(3 of 3)
(ANAND SHARMA),J
Jatin /14-15
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court below erred in dismissing applications to recall the order auctioning petitioners' attached land for forfeiture of surety bonds after the accused absconded.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kamal
Asfak
State of Rajasthan
Anand Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
