Dismissed¶¶37

Vinita Kanwar W/O Shivraj Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC25 Aug 2025CRLMB/9349/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail applications under Section 482 CrPC dismissed for petitioners named in FIR alleging serious assault with weapons causing grievous injuries; court denies bail considering gravity of offences and need for custodial interrogation.

What did the court decide?

The bail applications under Section 482 CrPC are rejected. The petitioners' names appear in the FIR with specific allegations of assault using weapons causing grievous injuries. The petitioners are not entitled to bail at this stage, and custodial interrogation is required. ¶¶36-¶37

Vinita Kanwar W/O Shivraj Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:33675]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9349/2025

¶4

Vinita Kanwar W/o Shivraj Singh, R/o Village Pichanot, Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli (Raj.)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9905/2025

¶11

Shivraj Singh S/o Ishwar Singh, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Village Pichanot, Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli (Raj.).

¶12

Ajay Singh S/o Shivraj Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village Pichanot, Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli (Raj.).

¶13

Vijay Singh S/o Shivraj Singh, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Village Pichanot, Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli (Raj.).

¶14

Sanjay Singh S/o Shivraj Singh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Village Pichanot, Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli (Raj.).

¶15

----Petitioners

¶16

Versus

¶17

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶18

----Respondent

¶19

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Ashok Choudhary for Mr. Deepak Chauhan
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Amit Punia, PP
	Mr. Haresh Meena with
	Mr. Rajendra Kumar Sharma

¶20

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶21

Order

¶22

25/08/2025

¶23

izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds varxZr iqfyl Fkkuk uknkSrh] ftyk&xaxkiqj flVh esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k

[2025:RJ-JP:33675]

[CRLMB-9349/2025]

(2 of 3)

168@2024 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 147] 148] 149] 323] 341] 324] 325] 308 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa vfxze tekur dk ykHk iznku fd, tkus gsrq mDr vyx&vyx izkFkZuk&i= izLrqr fd;s x;s gSaA

¶28

nksuksa izkFkZuk i= ,d gh izdj.k ls lacaf/kr gksus ds dkj.k budk fuLrkj.k bl ,d gh vkns'k ls fd;k tk jgk gSA

¶29

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd i{kdkjksa ds e/; [ksr dh nhokj dks ysdj fookn gqvk Fkk] ftlesa ifjoknh i{k ds 15 yksx izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ij vkØe.k djus vk, Fks vkSj bl laca/k esa izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk Hkh ifjoknh i{k ds fo:) Øksl izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ djokbZ xbZ gSA mudk rdZ gS fd mDr ?kVuk esa izkFkhZ i{k ds f'kojkt] fouhrk] vt; vkfn dks xaHkhj pksVsa vkbZ gSa vkSj iqfyl us ifjoknh i{k ds fo#) /kkjk 307 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk vijk/k izekf.kr ekuk gS] tcfd bl izdj.k dh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) /kkjk 308 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk vijk/k izekf.kr ekuk gSA izkfFkZ;k&vfHk;qDrk fofurk 64 o"kZ dh o`) efgyk gSA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k vuqla/kku esa Hkkx ysus ds fy, rRij gSA muds fxj¶rkj fd, tkus dh fLFkfr esa mudh lkekftd izfr"Bk [kjkc gksxhA vr% mudh vfxze tekur dk izkFkZuk&i= Lohdkj fd;k tk,A

¶30

blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd ,oa fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh dk rdZ gS fd izdj.k esa vc rd ds vuqla/kku ls izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) /kkjk 308 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk vijk/k izekf.kr ik;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dk uke izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vafdr gSA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk dkfjr ekjihV dh ?kVuk esa ,d ls vf/kd vkgrx.k ds flj esa /kkjnkj gfFk;kj ls pksV vkbZ gSA xaHkhj vijk/k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd vijk/k esa iz;qDr gfFk;kjksa dh cjkenxh dh tkuh gSA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ls vfHkj{kkRed iwNrkN ¼Custodial Interrogation½ dh Hkh vko';drk gSA vr% mUgsa vfxze tekur dh lqfo/kk ugha nh tk,A

¶31

IkzLrqr rdksZa ij euu fd;kA dsl Mk;jh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;k x;kA

¶32

izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) /kkjk 147] 148] 149] 323] 341] 324] 325] 308 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vijk/k dk vfHk;ksx gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa lHkh

[2025:RJ-JP:33675]

[CRLMB-9349/2025]

(3 of 3)

vfHk;qDrx.k uketn gksdj muds fo:) /kkjnkj gfFk;kjksa ls ySl gksdj ifjoknh i{k ds lkFk ekjihV dj xEHkhj pksVsa dkfjr djus ds vkjksi gSaA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr f'kojkt flag ij vkgrx.k vHk; flag o Qrsg flag ds VªsDVj ls VDdj ekjdj pksV igqapkus dk vk{ksi gS] ftlls vkgr Qrsg flag dh Nkrh esa xaHkhj pksV dkfjr gqbZ gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr fot; flag ij vkgr ctjkt flag ds flj esa Qjls ls pksV ekjus dk vk{ksi gSA izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr lat; flag ij vkgr xtsUnz flag ds flj esa dqYgkM+h }kjk rFkk vkgr jfoUnzflag ds flj esa Qjls }kjk pksV dkfjr djus dk vk{ksi gSA izkfFkZ;k&vfHk;qDr fofurk ij vkgr vHk;flag flj esa Qjls dh pksV dkfjr djus rFkk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr vt; flag }kjk vkgr vHk;flag ds ihB esa lcyh dh pksV dkfjr djus dk vk{ksi gSA i=koyh ij mDr vkgrx.k ds pksV izfrosnu miyC/k gS] ftlesa muds 'kjhj ds fofHkUu Hkkxksa ij pksVsa dkfjr gksus dk mYys[k gSA vkgrx.k xtsUnzflag] vHk;flag vkSj ctjktflag ds flj tSls ekfeZd Hkkx ij Hkh pksVsa vkuk pksV izfrosnu ls izdV gksrk gSA vuqla/kku ds nkSjku vkgrx.k ds ys[kc) c;kuksa esa izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk ifjoknh i{k ds lkFk ekjihV djus ds rF; izdV gq, gSaA ,slh fLFkfr esa ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k vijk/k esa lafyIr ugha gSA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ls vijk/k esa iz;qDr gfFk;kj dh cjkenxh dh tkuh gS] bl laca/k esa izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ls vfHkj{kkRed iwNrkN ¼Custodial Interrogation½ dh vko';drk crkbZ xbZ gSA vr% izdj.k ds leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ,oa vijk/k dh xEHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur dk izkFkZuk&i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA

¶37

ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr mDr nksuksa vfxze tekur izkFkZuk&i= varxZr /kkjk 482 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk vLohdkj dj fujLr fd;s tkrs gSaA

¶38

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶39

NIMIT GOYAL /64-65

Vinita Kanwar W/O Shivraj Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinita Kanwar W/O Shivraj Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Nagar W/O Late Satyanarayan D/O Ramprasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Priyanka Swami D/O Mangaldas Swami, Wife of Mukesh Swami, Vs State of Rajasthan

Pawan Kumar Jain S/O Bhagchand Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Manisha W/O Nihal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Sukhdev Sherawat S/O Shri Ganesh Sherawat Vs the State of Rajasthan

Pintu S/O Harkesh Vs State of Rajasthan