Anticipatory/regular bail application by the petitioner, who was already arrested in the case. Counsel stated the application had become infructuous; the High Court recorded the statement and dismissed the application as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:33546]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5009/2025
Pintu S/o Harkesh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Rawal, P.s. Kundera District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka through V.C. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
25/08/2025
izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us U;k;ky; ds le{k izdV fd;k fd izdj.k esa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDRk dks fxjQ~rkj fd;k tk pqdk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa ;g izkFkZuki= fu"Qy ¼Infructuous½ gks pqdk gSA
izkFkhZ vf/koDrk ds mDr dFku dks fjdkWMZ ij fy;k tkrk gS rFkk muds dFkuksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, mDr izkFkZuki= fu"Qy ¼Infructuous½ gks tkus ls fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
VISHAL SHARMA /30
Pintu
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
