Regular bail application by three co-accused in a forged-plot and cheating case arising from FIR No. 162/2024 at Kotwali Baran. Considering their prima facie complicity, recovery of Rs. 58,82,000, and the need for custodial interrogation, the High Court rejected the bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:33320]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Buddhi Prakash Meena with Mr. Anirudh Tyagi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Rahul Tiwari
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
22/08/2025
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr la[;k 01 Jherh larks"k ukxj ds laca/k esa ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk i= iwoZ esa fnukad 17-01-2025 dks okfil fy, tkus ds vk/kkj ij fuLrkfjr gks pqdk gSA
'ks"k izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k la[;k 2 ls 4 dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds varxZr iqfyl Fkkuk dksrokyh ckjka] ftyk&ckjka esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 162@2024 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 420] 406] 467] 468] 471]
[2025:RJ-JP:33320]
[CRLMB-525/2025]
(2 of 4)
120&ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa vfxze tekur dk ykHk iznku fd, tkus gsrq ;g izkFkZuk&i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k dks izdj.k esa feF;k lafyIr fd;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd rFkkdfFkr iV~Vs vkSj muds iath;u ds laca/k esa fu"ikfnr ys[ki= ls mudk dksbZ laca/k ugha gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k fufdrk vkSj ;ksxsUnz rks ys[ki= ds jftLVªs'ku dh dk;Zokgh esa lk{kh ek= Fks vkSj mUgksaus dsoy mlds fu"iknd dh igpku ds fy, gh gLrk{kj fd, gSaA mudk rdZ gS fd mDr ys[ki= esa D;k vadu gS] blds laca/k esa mUgsa dksbZ tkudkjh ugha Fkh vkSj ml vadu ds fy, os ftEesnkj Hkh ugha gSa] vius bl rdZ ds leFkZu esa izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k us ekuuh; mPPre U;k;ky; dk fuEu U;kf;d fofuf'p; izLrqr fd;k&
mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ jkf'k ugha yh xbZ gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vijk/k esa fdlh Hkh izdkj ls lafyIrrk ugha gSA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k us iwoZ esa ikfjr vkns'k dh ikyuk esa vuqla/kku esa Hkkx ys fy;k gS vkSj vc muls fdlh izdkj dh vfHkj{kkRed iwNrkN dh vko';drk ugha gSA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) iwoZ dk dksbZ vkijkf/kd izdj.k lafLFkr ugha gSA vr% mudh vfxze tekur dk izkFkZuk&i= Lohdkj fd;k tk,A
blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd o ifjoknh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds vuqlkj gh mDr vijk/k esa eq[; vfHk;qDrk Jherh larks"k ukxj ds lkFk vfHk;qDr eqds'k ukxj Hkh lkFk jgk gS vkSj mlh ds }kjk IykWV fn[kk;k Hkh x;k gS] blds vykok rFkkdfFkr QthZ iV~Vs ij mlds gLrk{kj Hkh gSaA mudk rdZ gS fd vfHk;qDr eqds'k ukxj ij jkf'k izkIr djus ds vk{ksi Hkh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa gSa vkSj bl laca/k esa ifjoknh us viuh Mk;jh dh udy Hkh is'k dh gS] tks dsl Mk;jh esa 'kkfey gSaA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k fufdrk vkSj ;ksxsUnz lkekU; xokg ugha gSa vkSj fufdrk eq[; vfHk;qDrk Jherh larks"k dh iq=h gS vkSj vfHk;qDr ;ksxsUnz ukxj mldk HkkbZ ¼Cousin½ gSA mudk rdZ gS fd ftl laifRr dk
[2025:RJ-JP:33320]
[CRLMB-525/2025]
(3 of 4)
ys[ki= fy[kk x;k gS] og vfHk;qDrk larks"k ukxj dh gS Hkh vFkok ugha] bl laca/k esa izkFkhZx.k dks iw.kZ tkudkjh FkhA mudk rdZ gS fd lHkh vfHk;qDrx.k us vkijkf/kd "kM~;a= djds QthZ iVVk cuk;k vkSj mldk jftLVªs'ku djkdj ifjoknh ls 58]82]000@& #i;s izkIr dj fy, gSaA mudk rdZ gS fd mDr jkf'k vfHk;qDrx.k fufdrk vkSj eqds'k ukxj ds }kjk Hkh izkIr dh xbZ gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk fd izkFkhZx.k dh vijk/k esa dksbZ lafyIrrk ugha gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izdj.k ;wvkbZVh dk QthZ iVVk cukdj laifRr dk varj.k dj Hkkjh ek=k esa jkf'k ysus dk gS] tks xaHkhj izd`fr dk vijk/k gSA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ls vfHkj{kkRed iwNrkN ¼Custodial Interrogation½ dh vko';drk gSA vr% mUgsa vfxze tekur dh lqfo/kk ugha nh tk,A
IkzLrqr rdksZa ij euu fd;kA i=koyh dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;k x;kA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) /kkjk 420] 406] 467] 468] 471] 120&ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vijk/k dk vfHk;ksx gSA izdj.k esa vfHk;qDrx.k ij ;g vk{ksi gS fd mUgksaus lgvfHk;qDrk Jherh larks"k ukxj ds lkFk feydj "kM;a= dj IykWV la[;k 37 vkj ds iqje dksVk dk QthZ iVVk cukdj mldh jftLVªh ifjoknh ds uke djok nh] ftldh ,ot esa vfHk;qDrx.k rFkk lgvfHk;qDrk Jherh larks"k ukxj us 58]82]000@& #i;s dh jkf'k izkIr dhA vfHk;qDrk fufdrk ukxj lgvfHk;qDrk larks"k ukxj dh iq=h gS vkSj izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa mudks #i;s nsus dk banzkt gS] lkFk gh bl laca/k esa ifjoknh }kjk mldh Mk;jh dh izfr Hkh is'k dh xbZ gS] ftlesa jkf'k nsus dk banzkt gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa izFke n`"V;k ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk fd vfHk;qDrk fufdrk dh vijk/k esa lafyIrrk ugha gSA
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr eqds'k ukxj dk izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa lgvfHk;qDrk Jherh larks"k ukxj ds lkFk tkuk] ifjoknh dks IykWV fn[kkuk vkSj gj oDr lgvfHk;qDrk Jherh larks"k ukxj ds lkFk jgdj jkf'k izkIr djus dk vk{ksi gS] blds vykok dwVjfpr iVVs ij Hkh izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr eqds'k ukxj ds gLrk{kj gSaA vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr eqds'k ukxj dh Hkh vijk/k esa izFke n`"V;k lafyIrrk nf'kZr gksrh gSA
tgka rd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ;ksxsUnz ukxj dk iz'u gS] og lgvfHk;qDrk larks"k ukxj dk HkkbZ ¼Cousin½ gS vkSj mDr iathc) nLrkost esa xokg Hkh FkkA bl
[2025:RJ-JP:33320]
[CRLMB-525/2025]
(4 of 4)
izdkj ls rhuksa izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh izFke n`"V~;k vijk/k esa lafyIrrk nf'kZr gksrh gSA izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ls /kks[kk/kM+h dj vftZr dh xbZ jkf'k dh cjkenxh dh tkuh gS vkSj bl laca/k esa muls xgu vuqla/kku ,oa vfHkj{kkRed iwNrkN ¼Custodial Interrogation½ dh vko';drk crkbZ xbZ gSA vr% izdj.k ds leLr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ,oa vijk/k dh xEHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur dk izkFkZuk&i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr ugha gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur izkFkZuk&i= varxZr /kkjk 482 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk vLohdkj dj fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
NIMIT GOYAL /20
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioners Nos. 2 to 4 were entitled to regular bail under Section 482 BNSS in FIR No. 162/2024 for offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hemkunwar Bai v. Sumer Singh & Ors., Civil Appeal No(s). 8827/2011Referred
Hemkunwar Bai V/s Sumer Singh & Ors.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh Nagar
Nikita Nagar
Mukesh Nagar
Yogendra Nagar
State of Rajasthan, through PP
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
