Allowed

Bachchusingh S/O Ratanlal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 Aug 2025CRLMB/9012/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge order granting interim bail to a petitioner detained since 2014 after a former owner's conviction and quashing of charges. The court condones trial delay and orders bail subject to compliance with statutory provisions and submission of security elsewhere.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail on interim order subject to submission of security deposit and appearance before court on further notice.

Bachchusingh S/O Ratanlal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:31815]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9012/2025

¶4

Bachchusingh S/o Ratanlal, R/o Village Salimpur, Police Station Nadbai, District Bharatpur (Raj.), At Present Constable No. 110/539, Police Line, Bharatpur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Sevar (Bhartpur)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan Mr. C.P. Bhandari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

¶10

Order

¶11

14/08/2025

¶12

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk dh /kkjk 483 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk& eFkqjk xsV] ftyk& Hkjriqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k& 574@2014 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 143] 323] 341] 302 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk esa is”k fd;k x;k gSA

¶13

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku~ vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd izdj.k esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo#) /kkjk 302 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds varxZr frrack pktZ'khV izLrqr dj izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk fopkj.k fd;k tk jgk gSA izdj.k esa eq[; p{kqn'khZ lk{kh ihMCY;w 1 ?ku';ke us vius eq[; ijh{k.k esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr }kjk e`rd foØe] Lo;a] HkwisUnz] fcztsUnz] xksfoUnk o ?ku';ke ds lkFk ekjihV djus ds dFkuksa ls Li"V budkj fd;k gS vkSj og i{knzksgh ?kksf"kr gqvk gSA i{knzksgh ?kksf"kr gksus ds mijkar Hkh mDr lk{kh us lacaf/kr yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk ftjg djus ij vfHk;kstu i{k dh dgkuh dk leFkZu ugha fd;k gSA blh izdkj vU; p{kqn'khZ lk{kh ihMCY;w 2 'ksjflag] ihMCY;w 3

[2025:RJ-JP:31815]

[CRLMB-9012/2025]

(2 of 3)

laxzke flag] ihMCY;w 4 lquhy] ihMCY;w 5 Hkwj flag us Hkh vfHk;kstu i{k dh dgkuh dk leFkZu ugha fd;k gS vkSj lHkh lk{khx.k i{knzksgh ?kksf"kr gq, gSa vkSj mUgksaus bl rF; ls budkj fd;k gS fd ekjihV djus esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr cPpwflag vU; lgvfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk lfEefyr FkkA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izdj.k e s a vU; lgvfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) fopkj.k fd;k tkdj vU; lgvfHk;qDrx.k dks U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; fnukad 11-01-2018 ds }kjk nks"kfl) fd;k x;kA mDr nks"kflf) dks vU; lgvfHk;qDrx.k }kjk ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; esa pqukSrh nh xbZ vkSj mPp U;k;ky; }kjk /kkjk 302 vkbZihlh ds vijk/k dks /kkjk 304 vkbZihlh esa ifjofrZr djrs gq, vU; lgvfHk;qDrx.k dh nks"kflf) dks ;Fkkor j[kk x;kA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd mDr nks"kflf) ds lanHkZ esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; ds le{k rRle; lk{khx.k 'ksjflag] ?ku';ke] eqjkjhyky] laxzke flag] lquhy] Hkwjflag ds dFku ys[kc) gq, Fks vkSj mUgksaus Hkh rRle; vius c;kuksa esa bl izdkj dk dksbZ dFku mYysf[kr ugha fd;k Fkk fd e`rd foØe o muds lkFk ekjihV djus esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr cPpwflag Hkh ?kVuk ds le; ?kVukLFky ij mifLFkr FkkA mDr lk{khx.k us vius dFkuksa es vU; lgvfHk;qDrx.k HkwisUnz] ?ku';ke] xksfoUnk] fcztsUnz }kjk ekjihV djuk crk;k gS vkSj izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh mDr ?kVuk esa mifLFkfr nf'kZr ugha dh gSA rnqijkar izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds lanHkZ esa fopkj.k Hkh mijksDr lk{khx.k i{knzksgh ?kksf"kr gks pqds gSaA izdj.k esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr fnukad 1205-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa py jgk gSA izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa yack le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk,A

¶18

fo}ku~ yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;k x;kA mudk rdZ gS fd izdj.k esa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr yacs le; rd xSjgkftj jgk gS vkSj mlds fo#) LVsafMax okjaV tkjh fd;k x;k gSA LVsafMax okjaV tkjh gksus mijkar izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr }kjk o"kZ 2025 esa vkReleiZ.k fd;k x;k gSA ?kVuk o"kZ 2014 dh gS ,oa bl izdkj izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr yxHkx 11 o"kZ rd fopkj.k ds izØe ij xSjgkftj jgk gSA vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk vkpj.k mldks tekur dk ykHk fn, tkus dk vf/kdkjh ugha cukrk gS] ;fn

[2025:RJ-JP:31815]

[CRLMB-9012/2025]

(3 of 3)

izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkrk gS] rks mlds iqu% xSjgkftj gksus o izdj.k dks foyafcr djus dh laHkkouk ls budkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA vr% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur vkosnu vLohdkj fd;k tk,A

¶23

cgl lquh xbZA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶24

bl izØe ij izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.kksa ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;k tkuk visf{kr ugha gSA izdj.k ds eq[; p{kqn'khZ lk{khx.k ihMCY;w 1 ?ku';ke] ihMCY;w 2 'ksjflag] ihMCY;w 3 laxzke flag] ihMCY;w 4 lquhy] ihMCY;w 5 Hkwj flag us izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr }kjk ekjihV djus ls budkj fd;k gS vkSj og i{knzksgh ?kksf"kr gq, gSaA ;|fi ;g lgh gS fd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr yacs le; rd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ iathc) gksus ds mijkar xSjgkftj jgk gS] rnqijkar ;g rF; Hkh vfHkys[k ij vk;k gS fd o"kZ 2019 ls 2024 rd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds lanHkZ esa izlaKku fy, tkus ds vkns'k dks jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; esa pqukSrh nh xbZ Fkh vkSj mDr dk;Zokgh esa izdj.k dh dk;Zokgh yafcr jghA mDr ;kfpdk varr% mPp U;k;ky; ds vkns'k fnukad 12-09-2024 ds }kjk fuLrkfjr dh xbZ gSA vr% mijksDr leLr rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, eSa izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd, tkus ;ksX; le>rk gw¡A

¶25

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr cPpwflag iq= jruyky dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns”k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj #i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o iPphl&iPphl gtkj #i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo”oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko”;drk u gks] rks vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶26

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

¶27

MOHIT/ 5

Bachchusingh S/O Ratanlal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bachchusingh S/O Ratanlal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Panchal S/O Shri Premshankar Vs State of Rajasthan

Mst.Rukhana Vs State and Ors.

Vijay Kumar Damor S/O Lalit Kumar Damor Vs State of Rajasthan

Anil Kumar Sharma S/O Shri Mata Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamlesh Kumar Jhalani Son of Shri Babulal Jhalani Vs the State of Rajasthan

Tulsidas S/O Dularam Vs State of Rajasthan