The High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur, dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging convictions under Sections 498 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code. The revisional court found no irregularity in the lower court's appreciation of evidence regarding dowry demands and assault, thereby upholding the conviction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:31667]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1011/2007
Mst. Rukhsana wife of Mohammed Yunus, Resident of House No. 4376, Chokri Topkhana Hazuri, Mohalla Chhappar Bandhan, P.S. Ramganj, Jaipur.
----Complainant-Petitioner.
Versus
----Respondent.
All are resident of Ghat Gate, Jaipur.
----Accused-Respondents.
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
13/08/2025
iqujh{k.kdrkZ@ifjoknh }kjk mDr ;kfpdk vihyh; U;k;ky; fof'k"V U;k;k/kh'k] vuqlwfpr tkfr@tutkfr ¼v-fu-½ izdj.k] t;iqj }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 05-06-2007 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh xbZ gS] ftlds }kjk vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk QkStnkjh izdj.k la[;k 201@1991] ljdkj cuke cqUnq [kka oxSjk esa izR;FkhZx.k eksgEen ;quql] cqUnq [kka] [kkrwu] eksgEen v;wc] vCnqy oghn] 'kkgtgk¡] lTtks ,oa tk;nk dks Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk dh /kkjk 498,] 323 ds varxZr nks"keqDr fd;k x;k gSA
(2 of 2)
[2025:RJ-JP:31667]
[CRLR-1011/2007]
iqujh{k.kdrkZ@ifjoknh dh vksj ls dksbZ vf/koDrk mifLFkr ugha gSA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
vk{ksfir fu.kZ; ds lanHkZ esa lacaf/kr vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lk{; dk foospu djus ds mijkar lacaf/kr v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk izR;FkhZx.k ds lanHkZ esa ikfjr nks"kflf) ds vkns'k dks vikLr djrs gq, mUgsa nks"keqDr fd;k x;k gSA bl lanHkZ esa lacaf/kr vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk lk{khx.k ihMCY;w 1 #[klkuk] tks fd izdj.k dh ifjoknh gS] ihMCY;w 2 Jherh lq'khyk oekZ] ihMCY;w 3 'kkjnk] ihMCY;w 4 vCnqy vtht] ihMCY;w 5 vCnqy djhe] ihMCY;w 7 lSQmíhu dh lk{; dk foLrkj ls foospu djus ds mijkar ;g ik;k x;k gS fd izdj.k esa izR;{kn'khZ lk{kh ds :i esa ihMCY;w 7 lSQmíhu dks nf'kZr fd;k x;k gS] ijarq ihMCY;w 7 lSQmíhu us U;k;ky; ds le{k ifjoknh #[klkuk dks ugha tkuuk dgk gS vkSj i{knzksgh ?kksf"kr gqvk gSA Lo;a ifjoknh us viuh fjiksVZ izn'kZ ih 1 esa ek= vius ifr eksgEen ;quql ds }kjk ngst dh ekax fd;k tkuk crk;k gS] ijarq U;k;ky; ds le{k eq[; ijh{kk ds izØe ij ifjoknh us ifjokj ds lHkh lnL;ksa }kjk 50]000@& #i;s] Vh-oh- ,oa eksVjlkbfdy dh ekax djuk crk;k gSA ifjoknh us vius izfrijh{k.k esa ;g rF; Hkh mYysf[kr fd;k gS fd og fookg ds rhu ekg mijkar ls vyx jg jgh gSA
vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa lacaf/kr vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk ifjoknh ds dFkuksa esa xaHkhj fojks/kkHkkl ,oa Lora= lk{kh ihMCY;w 7 lSQmíhu }kjk mldh lk{; dh iqf"V u djus ds vk/kkj ij izR;FkhZx.k dks Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk dh /kkjk 498,] 323 ds varxZr nks"keqDr fd;k x;k gSA
esjs fouez er esa vihyh; U;k;ky; ds }kjk mDr fu"d"kZ ij igq¡pus ds fy, tks lk{; dk foospu fd;k x;k gS] og mfpr izdV gksrk gS vkSj mlesa dksbZ voS/kkfudrk izdV ugha gksrh gSA
vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa iqujh{k.kdrkZ@ifjoknh }kjk izLrqr mDr iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk lkjghu gksus ls [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
MOHIT/ 19
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court's conviction under Sections 498 and 323 IPC was based on proper appreciation of evidence and free from irregularity?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mst. Rukhsana
State of Rajasthan
Mohammed Yunus
Bundu Khan
Smt. Khatun
Mohammed Ayub
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
