Nine petitioners in a bail application appeared neither at the hearing nor on the earlier listing date of 03-07-2025. Concluding that the petitioners were not interested in pursuing the application, the court dismissed it as untraced.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:35660]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2721/2025
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
04/09/2025
izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls vkt dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA iwoZ esa izdj.k fnukad 03-07-2025 dks lwphc) gqvk Fkk] rc Hkh izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha Fkk]
[2025:RJ-JP:35660]
[CRLMB-2721/2025]
(2 of 2)
ftlls ,slk izrhr gksrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k mDr izkFkZuki= dks vkxs pykus dks bPNqd ugha gSaA
mi;qZDrkuqlkj ;g izkFkZuki= vne gkftjh] vne iSjoh esa fujLr fd;k
tkrk gSA
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
VISHAL SHARMA /42
Premvati
Pintu
Vimlesh
Girdhar
Ranjana
Radha
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
