Lokesh Meena S/O Bhanwar Lal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.06/2025, registered at Police Station Vidhayek Puri, Jaipur City (South), for the offence(s) under Sections 8/21 of the N.D.P.S. Act, the accused-petitioner has preferred this criminal misc. bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S.

¶14

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that apart from the disclosure statement of the other co-accused there is no substantial evidence available on the record indicating the accused-petitioner has supplied the said contraband article to the other co-accused and no transaction was ever made between the petitioner and the other co-accused. The petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation, custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required, therefore,

¶15

[2025:RJ-JP:5696]

¶16

[CRLMB-1894/2025]

¶17

(2 of 3)

¶18

the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.

¶19

Learned GA-cum-AAG has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner. It is contended that from the other co-accused, the said contraband article was recovered, they have disclosed the name of the accused-petitioner and the accused-petitioner did not appear before the concerned Court and evading the proceedings, therefore, the anticipatory bail application of the accusedpetitioner may be dismissed.

¶20

Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. Apart from the disclosure statement of the other co-accused there is no substantial evidence available on the record indicating the accused-petitioner has supplied the said contraband article to the other co-accused, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner.

¶21

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Lokesh Meena S/o Bhanwar Lal Meena, in connection with FIR No.06/2025, registered at Police Station Vidhayek Puri, Jaipur City (South), he shall be enlarged on bail he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶22

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶23

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or

(3 of 3)

[2025:RJ-JP:5696]

[CRLMB-1894/2025]

indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶28

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶29

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

¶30

Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-17

Lokesh Meena S/O Bhanwar Lal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lokesh Meena S/O Bhanwar Lal Meena v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bajrang S/O Bharti Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Aakiv S/O Jameel Vs State of Rajasthan

Sheesh Ram S/O Banshi Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Hukam Singh S/O Pyar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Sabir S/O Iqbal Vs State of Rajasthan

Gaurav Arora S/O Krishan Kumar Arora Vs the Central Bureau of Narcotics