Allowed

Sabir S/O Iqbal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Feb 2025CRLMB/1323/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner. The court noted the case is exclusively triable by Magistrate and the petitioner is cooperative, granting bail subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner to furnish personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each on specific conditions.

Sabir S/O Iqbal Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:5689]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.1323/2025

¶4

Sabir S/o Iqbal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Kalyanpur, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Liyakat Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

¶11

Order

¶12

10/02/2025

¶13

Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.198/2024, registered at Police Station Khoh, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a), 313, 317(5) and 303(2) of B.N.S. and Section 66-D of I.T. Act., the accused-petitioner has preferred this criminal misc. bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S.

¶14

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is argued that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation, therefore, the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner.

(2 of 2)

[2025:RJ-JP:5689]

[CRLMB-1323/2025]

Heard and perused the material available on the record.

¶20

Considering the fact that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and the accused-petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation, without further elaborating upon the factual aspects, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner.

¶21

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Sabir S/o Iqbal, in connection with FIR No.198/2024, registered at Police Station Khoh, District Deeg, he shall be enlarged on bail he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶22

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶23

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶24

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶25

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

¶26

Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-26

Sabir S/O Iqbal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sabir S/O Iqbal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bajrang S/O Bharti Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Aakiv S/O Jameel Vs State of Rajasthan

Sheesh Ram S/O Banshi Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Hukam Singh S/O Pyar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Gaurav Arora S/O Krishan Kumar Arora Vs the Central Bureau of Narcotics

Lokesh Meena S/O Bhanwar Lal Meena Vs State of Rajasthan