In this bail application, the petitioner alleged false implication in an offence under Section 382 IPC. The High Court, without delving into merits, allowed the bail petition.
The accused-petitioner was enlarged on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:46658]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14736/2025
Yakub @ Fakira S/o Astu @ Ragad, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Samred, Police Station Pahari, District Bharatpur, Raj. (At Present Accused In Judicial Custody At District Alwar).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Azad Ahmed For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Judgment
19/11/2025
The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.83/2013 registered at Police Station Tijara District Alwar for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 382 IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case, he has nothing to do with the alleged offence and he is behind the bars since 08.10.2025. The other co-accused has already been acquitted. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, his further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and he is ready and willing to furnish his bail bonds. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
(2 of 2)
[2025:RJ-JP:46658]
[CRLMB-14736/2025]
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
Therefore, the bail application is allowed . Accused-petitioner namely Yakub @ Fakira S/o Astu @ Ragad shall be released on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any other court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
Sudha/163
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused-petitioner should be granted bail alleging false implication in a non-bailable offence.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Yakub @ Fakira S/o Astu @ Ragad
State Of Rajasthan
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
