Allowed

Saddam @ Paro S/O Mohammad Khalil v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC18 Nov 2025CRLMB/14627/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 483 BNSS by an accused charged under Sections 331(3) and 305(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, in custody since May 2025 with charge-sheet filed. The High Court, without commenting on merits, enlarged the petitioner on bail on a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.

What the court decided

AI extract

Saddam @ Paro S/O Mohammad Khalil Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:46521]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14627/2025

¶4

Saddam @ Paro S/o Mohammad Khalil, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Kabir Nagar Dhan Sanhida Colony, Soorsagar, Police Station Soorsagar, District Jodhpur. (Petitioner Is Confined In Sub Jail Sambhar Lake, Jaipur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Pareek with Mr. Sarosh Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP

¶10

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶11

Judgment

¶12

18/11/2025

¶13

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.12/2025 registered at Police Station Sambhar District Jaipur Rural for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 331(3) & 305(a) B.N.S.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case, he has nothing to do with the alleged offence and he is behind the bars since 05.05.2025. The case is triable by a Court of Magistrate. After investigation, charge-sheet has been filed in the matter. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by a co-ordinate bench of this Court. Trial of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, his further incarceration would not serve any

(2 of 2)

[2025:RJ-JP:46521]

[CRLMB-14627/2025]

fruitful purpose and he is ready and willing to furnish his bail bonds. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶20

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

¶21

Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶22

Therefore, the bail application is allowed . Accused-petitioner namely; Saddam @ Paro S/o Mohammad Khalil shall be released on bail, if he is not required in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/(Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any other court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so.

¶23

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶24

Sudha/215

Saddam @ Paro S/O Mohammad Khalil v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Saddam @ Paro S/O Mohammad Khalil v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karan Singh @ Charan Singh S/O Shri Omprakash Vs State of Rajasthan

Akshay Kumar Gautam Son of Kailash Chand Gautam Vs State of Rajasthan

Kishor S/O Ballo Vs State of Rajasthan

Sumit Kumar Meghani S/O Shri Shyam Sunder Meghani Vs the State of Rajasthan

Vaidprakash Son of Shri Balveer Vs State of Rajasthan

Gaurav S/O Late Rajesh Harijan Vs State of Rajasthan