Allowed

Juned S/O Ishaq v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC19 Nov 2025CRLMB/14599/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application by two accused in custody since September 2025 in an FIR for offences including cheating and forgery under BNS and Section 66D of the IT Act. Charge-sheet filed; co-accused already granted bail. Court enlarged the petitioners on bail on furnishing personal bonds with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs.50,000 each with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.

Juned S/O Ishaq Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:46656]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14599/2025

¶4

Juned S/o Ishaq, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Bubalheri, Police Station Pingaon, District Nuh Mewat, Haryana. (At Present Accused In Judicial Custody At District Jail Alwar).

¶5

Irfan S/o Gillu, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ishan Ka Bas, Police Station Nouganwa, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Accused In Judicial Custody At District Jail Alwar)

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Azad Ahmed For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, PP

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

¶12

Judgment

¶13

19/11/2025

¶14

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No. 346/2025 registered at Police Station Nouganwa District Alwar for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 112(2), 319(2), 318(4) 336(3) & 340(2) B.N.S. & Sections 66 D of the Information & Technology (amended) Act, 2008.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case, they have nothing to do with the alleged offence and they are behind the bars since 27.09.2025. After investigation, charge-sheet has been filed in the matter. The other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by the learned trial Court. Trial of the case is

[2025:RJ-JP:46656]

[CRLMB-14599/2025]

(2 of 2)

likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, their further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and they are ready and willing to furnish their bail bonds. Therefore, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶21

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

¶22

Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

¶23

Therefore, the bail application is allowed. Accused-petitioners namely (i)Juned S/o Ishaq & (ii) Irfan S/o Gillu shall be released on bail, if they are not required in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any other court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when they are called upon to do so.

¶24

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

¶25

Sudha/162

Juned S/O Ishaq v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Juned S/O Ishaq v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sumit Kumar Meghani S/O Shri Shyam Sunder Meghani Vs the State of Rajasthan

Vaidprakash Son of Shri Balveer Vs State of Rajasthan

Saddam @ Paro S/O Mohammad Khalil Vs the State of Rajasthan

Abdul Sattar S/O Ummed Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Yakub @ Fakira S/O Astu @ Ragad Vs State of Rajasthan

Bablu S/O Gedaram Vs State of Rajasthan