The High Court disposed of the petitioner's anticipatory bail application based on the Public Prosecutor's factual report stating the petitioner's non-involvement in the alleged offence. Liberty was granted to file a fresh application if needed.
Anticipatory bail application disposed of with liberty to file afresh if situation arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:1773]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14097/2024
Mukesh Singh S/o Shri Ram Singh, R/o B-505, Tulip Ashadeep, Neemrana, Tehsil Neemrana, District Kotputli-Behror. (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Gaurav Gupta |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Ms. Manju Dave, PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order
13/01/2025
Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the factual report. In the factual report it is clearly mentioned that the petitioner Mukesh Singh was not found to be involved in the said offence under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC. Factual report is taken on record.
Considering the fact mentioned in the factual report, instant anticipatory bail application is disposed of with the liberty to petitioner to file afresh bail application, if the situation, so arises.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
ashu /15
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail considering the acceptance of the Public Prosecutor's factual report.
Mukesh Singh
State Of Rajasthan
Praveer Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
