Yogesh Dua S/O Shri Devi Das Dua Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2025)

Yogesh Dua S/O Shri Devi Das Dua Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Anticipatory bail allowed: in the event of arrest, the accused-applicant is to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, subject to joining the investigation and appearing before the Investigating Officer on 24.11.2025 at 11:00 A.M., and to standard conditions (availability for interrogation with cessation of the order on non-cooperation; no inducement, threat or promise; no leaving India without previous permission of the court).

Issue for consideration

Whether anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS should be granted to the applicant (Yogesh Dua) in connection with FIR No. 251/2022, Police Station Malpura Gate, District Jaipur City (East), for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 389 and 120B IPC.

Court's answer

The Court allowed the anticipatory bail application, subject to the condition that the applicant join the investigation and appear before the Investigating Officer concerned on 24.11.2025 at 11:00 A.M., having considered that the matter is triable by a Magistrate and that repeated FIRs were lodged.

Ratio / Principle

In the event of arrest, the accused-applicant Yogesh Dua S/o Shri Devi Das Dua shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station in F.I.R. No. 251/2022.

Key takeaways

The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; if he fails to join and render due cooperation in the investigation or does not mark appearance as directed, the present order allowing anticipatory bail shall cease to operate.ratio¶22
Condition of bail: the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer.ratio¶23
Condition of bail: the applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT (JAIPUR BENCH) — ANTICIPATORY BAIL GRANTED UNDER S. 482 BNSS. S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10336/2025; Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sameer Jain; decided 10.11.2025. Yogesh Dua sought anticipatory bail in FIR No. 251/2022, Police Station Malpura Gate, District Jaipur City (East), for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 389 and 120B IPC. Considering that the matter is triable by a Magistrate and that repeated FIRs had been lodged, the Court allowed the application, directing that in the event of arrest the applicant be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each, conditioned on his joining the investigation and appearing before the Investigating Officer on 24.11.2025 at 11:00 A.M.; failure to cooperate or mark appearance causes the order to cease to operate; usual conditions (no inducement, threat or promise; no departure from India without previous permission of the court) were imposed.

[2025:RJ-JP:44966]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10336/2025

Yogesh Dua S/o Shri Devi Das Dua, Aged About 48 Years, R/o 112/175, Agrawal Farm, Mansarovar, Jaipur (Raj.)

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Malkhan Chaturvedi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Judgment

10/11/2025

The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 251/2022 registered at Police Station Malpura Gate District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 389, 120B IPC.

Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter. It is further submitted that repeated FIRs were lodged and in one first FIR, after due investigation, no case was found. It is also submitted that matter is triable by Magistrate. Furthermore, it is submitted that complainant is erstwhile business partner of the applicant.

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

Having heard and considered the contentions made by the counsel representing the parties, upon a perusal of the material

[2025:RJ-JP:44966]

[CRLMB-10336/2025]

(2 of 2)

available on record, and considering the fact that matter is triable by Magistrate; that repeated FIRs were lodged, this Court is inclined to allow the instant anticipatory bail application subject to the condition that applicant shall join the investigation and appear before the Investigating Officer concerned on 24.11.2025 at 11:00 A.M.

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Malpura Gate District Jaipur City (East) in F.I.R. No. 251/2022 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicant Yogesh Dua S/o Shri Devi Das Dua shall be released on bail, provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

(i) that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; and if the applicant fails to join and render due cooperation in the investigation or does not mark appearance before the concerned authority, as directed hereinabove, the present order allowing anticipatory bail to the applicant shall cease to operate;

(ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

(iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

(SAMEER JAIN),J

Pooja /245