Dismissed

Smt. Indrakanwar W/O Late Shri Jaisingh v. Rajesh Agarwal S/O Late Shri Krishnakant Agarwal

Rajasthan HC28 Oct 2025CR/210/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court allowed and dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed by seven sisters challenging a judgment in a settlement and partnership dispute. The Court held that the claims regarding ratification and partnership were issues not raised in the separate Civil Revision, thus barring them in the current petition.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed.

Smt. Indrakanwar W/O Late Shri Jaisingh Vs… — Succession and Inheritance | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:43218]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 210/2024

¶4

Smt. Indrakanwar W/o Late Shri Jaisingh, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Railway Colony, Sawai Madhopur At Present Behind Ramsingh Surgical Hospital, Ranthambhore Road, Sawai Madhopur.

¶5

Smt. Vinod Kanwar, D/o Late Shri Jaisiingh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Railway Colony, Sawai Madhopur At Present Behind Ramsingh Surgical Hospital, Ranthambhore Road, Sawai Madhopur.

¶6

Dharmendra Singh S/o Late Singh Jaisingh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Railway Colony, Sawai Madhopur At Present Behind Ramsingh Surgical Hospital, Ranthambhore Road, Sawai Madhopur.

¶7

Vijendra Singh S/o Late Shri Jaisingh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Railway Colony, Sawai Madhopur At Present Behind Ramsingh Surgical Hospital, Ranthambhore Road, Sawai Madhopur.

¶8

Bhanupratap Singh S/o Late Shri Jaisingh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Railway Colony, Sawai Madhopur At Present Behind Ramsingh Surgical Hospital, Ranthambhore Road, Sawai Madhopur.

¶9

Smt. Kavita D/o Late Shri Jaisingh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Railway Colony, Sawai Madhopur At Present Behind Ramsingh Surgical Hospital, Ranthambhore Road, Sawai Madhopur.

¶10

Smt. Savita D/o Late Shri Jaisingh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Railway Colony, Sawai Madhopur At Present Behind Ramsingh Surgical Hospital, Ranthambhore Road, Sawai Madhopur.

¶11

Smt. Rekha D/o Late Shri Jaisingh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Railway Colony, Sawai Madhopur At Present Behind Ramsingh Surgical Hospital, Ranthambhore Road, Sawai Madhopur.

¶12

----Petitioners/Defendants No. 1 to 8

[2025:RJ-JP:43218]

[CR-210/2024]

(2 of 3)

Versus

Rajesh Agarwal S/o Late Shri Krishnakant Agarwal, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Adarsh Nagar A, Sawai Madhopur.

¶18

Prabhu Lal Bairwa S/o Shrinarayan Bairwa, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Phalodi Kwari Todra, Tehsil Khandar, District Sawai Madhopur,.

¶19

Govind Singh Ranawat, S/o Shri Zorsingh Ranawat, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Near By Tata Docomi Tower, Village Kushtala, Tehsil And District Sawai Madhopur.

¶20

Virendra Singh Gurjar S/o Shri Chiranji Lal Gurjar, Aged About 47 Years, R/o 87 Shyam Vatika, Housing Board Colony, Tehsil And District Sawai Madhopur.

¶21

----Respondents

¶22

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Pujari, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shantanu Gupta, Adv. Mr. Vivek Yadav, Adv. Ms. Harshita Sharma, Adv.

¶23

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶24

28/10/2025

¶25

;kphx.k&izfroknh Øe&1 ls 8 dh vksj ls ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fo}ku ftyk U;k;k/kh'k] lokbZek/kksiqj }kjk nhokuh okn la[;k&01@2024 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 24-04-2024 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh xbZ] ftlds ek/;e ls izfroknh Øe&1 ls 8 dk vkosnu varxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- [kkfjt fd;k x;kA

¶26

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kphx.k o v;kphx.k dh cgl lquh] vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶27

fo}ku vf/koDrk izfroknh Øe&1 ls 8 dk fuosnu gS fd muds }kjk oknh ds lkFk dksbZ foØ; vuqca/k fu"ikfnr ugha fd;k x;k gS rFkk izfroknh Øe&9 }kjk ;fn oknhx.k ds i{k esa dksbZ foØ; vuqca/k fu"ikfnr fd;k gS

¶28

(3 of 3) [CR-210/2024]

¶29

[2025:RJ-JP:43218]

¶30

rks og vf/kdkjfoghu gS vkSj mlesa izfroknh Øe&1 ls 8 i{kdkj ugha Fks] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa izfroknh Øe&1 ls 8 ds fo:) dksbZ okn dkj.k oknhx.k dks mRiUu ugha gqvk gS] vr% mudk okn ukeatwj gksus ;ksX; gSA

¶31

fo}ku vf/koDrk foi{khx.k dk fuosnu gS fd mBk;k x;k fo"k; fopkj.k dk fo"k; gS] vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds Ldksi esa ugha vkrk gS] var esa vk{ksfir vkns'k dks fof/klEer gksuk crkrs gq, ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶32

oknhx.k dk ;g vfHkdFku gS fd oknxzLr Hkwfe izfroknh Øe&1 ls 8 ds [kkrsnkjh vf/kdkjksa dh Fkh] ftlds laca/k esa oknhx.k o izfroknh Øe&9 dh lgefr ls izfroknh Øe&9 ds i{k esa foØ; vuqca/k fu"ikfnr gqvk rFkk dkykarj esa izfroknh Øe&9 }kjk oknhx.k ds i{k esa foØ; vuqca/k fu"ikfnr fd;k x;k vkSj mlds laca/k esa fofufnZ"V vuqikyuk o LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk dk okn izLrqr fd;k x;kA

¶33

fo}ku vf/koDrk izfroknh Øe&1 ls 8 }kjk tks vkifRr yh xbZ gS] mlds vuqlkj vf/kdre ;g laHkkouk gS fd oknhx.k okn esa lQy ugha gksaxs] ijarq fofufnZ"V vuqikyuk o LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk ds laca/k esa okni= esa of.kZr vfHkdFkuksa ds vuqlkj okn dkj.k mRiUu gksuk izdV gqvk gSA mBk;s x;s lHkh fookn@fo"k; rF;ksa o fof/k dk fefJr iz'u gS vkSj vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds Ldksi esa ugha vkrk gSA mijksDr n`f"Vdks.k ls fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk vk{ksfir vkns'k rF;ksa o fof/k ds vuq:i gSA

¶34

ifj.kker% ;kphx.k&izfroknh Øe&1 ls 8 dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk vLohdkj dj [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 24-04-2024 dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA LFkxu vkosnu o vU; vkosnu] ;fn dksbZ yafcr gksa] rks os Hkh mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;s tkrs gSaA

¶35

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶36

DINESH KUMAWAT /27

Smt. Indrakanwar W/O Late Shri Jaisingh v. Rajesh Agarwal S/O Late Shri Krishnakant Agarwal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Indrakanwar W/O Late Shri Jaisingh v. Rajesh Agarwal S/O Late Shri Krishnakant Agarwal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kailash Chand Meena S/O Shri Kishan Lal Meena, Vs Shri Subir Kumar

Mohammad Iqbal S/O Mohammad Ismail Vs Mohammad Ismail S/O Haji Nabibaksh

Gulam Rasool Khan Vs P Kumar

Kumari Manvi Paliwal D/O Shri Manoj Kumar Paliwal Vs Sh. Naveen Jain

Smt Bholi Devi W/O Dhannaram Vs Prabhat Alias Prabhata S/O Chotu

Neeru D/O Shri Inder Pal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan