Dismissed

Mohammad Iqbal S/O Mohammad Ismail v. Mohammad Ismail S/O Haji Nabibaksh

Rajasthan HC27 Oct 2025CR/10/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Revision against order rejecting defendant's Order VII Rule 11 CPC application seeking plaint rejection on the ground that a pre-suit gift deed transferred suit property to two sons. Court held title and ownership are matters of trial, not triable under Order VII Rule 11 scope, and dismissed the revision while upholding the impugned order.

What the court decided

AI extract

Mohammad Iqbal S/O Mohammad Ismail Vs Mohammad Ismail… — Property and Title | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:42897]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 10/2025

¶4

Mohammad Iqbal S/o Mohammad Ismail, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Nichemandi, Station Road, Chaumahla Mandi, Rajendrapur, District Jhalawar- 326515 (Raj.)

¶5

----Petitioner/Defendant

¶6

Versus

¶7

Mohammad Ismail S/o Haji Nabibaksh, Aged About 80 Years, R/o Nichemandi, Station Road, Chaumahla Mandi, Rajendrapur, District Jhalawar- 326515 (Raj.)

¶8

----Respondent/Plaintiff

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad, Adv. Mr. Iliyas Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ankul Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rahul Ghiya, Adv.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶11

Judgment / Order

¶12

27/10/2025

¶13

;kph&izfroknh dh vksj ls ;g flfoy fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fo}ku ofj"B flfoy U;k;k/kh'k ,oa vfrfjDr eq[; U;kf;d eftLVªsV] pkSesgyk] ftyk&>kykokM+ }kjk nhokuh okn la[;k&15@2022 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 24-08-2023 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh] ftlds ek/;e ls izfroknh dk vkosnu varxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- vLohdkj fd;k x;kA

¶14

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph o v;kph dh cgl lquh xbZ] vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

[CR-10/2025]

[2025:RJ-JP:42897]

(2 of 3)

oknh }kjk vius iq= ;kph&izfroknh eksgEen bdcky ds fo:) oknxzLr ifjlj ds dCtk izkfIr o LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk ds laca/k esa okn izLrqr dj vfHkdfFkr fd;k fd oknh }kjk vius iq= dks oknxzLr laifRr jgus gsrq dqN le; ds fy, nh Fkh] ysfdu izfroknh dk O;ogkj oknh ds izfrdwy gks x;k gS vkSj bl vk/kkj ij dCtk izkfIr o vU; vuqrks"k iznRr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶19

izfroknh dh vksj ls vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- dk vkosnu izLrqr dj fuosnu fd;k fd ;g okn o"kZ 2022 esa izLrqr gqvk gS rFkk mlls iwoZ gh iathd`r nku i= fnukad 17-12-2021 ds ek/;e ls oknxzLr laifRr dk vk/kk fgLlk oknh }kjk vius iq= eksgEen vejhu dks rFkk vk/kk fgLlk nwljs iq= eksgEen vnzhl dks nku dj fn;k gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa okn izLrqfr ds le; bl laifRr esa oknh dk dksbZ vf/kdkj ugha jgk gSA fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vk{ksfir vkns'k ds ek/;e ls ;g vfHker izdV fd;k fd ;g fookn rF;ksa dk fo"k; gS vkSj bl vk/kkj ij vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lhdk vkosnu [kkfjt fd;kA

¶20

ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Eldeco Housing and Indurstries Ltd. Vs. Ashok Vidyarthi and Ors. 2023 INSC 1043 ,oa Soumitra Kumar Sen Vs. Shyamlal Kumar Sen & Ors. 2018 DNJ (SC) 769 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds vkosnu ij fopkj djrs le; ek= oknh ds vfHkdFkuksa o okni= ds lkFk izLrqr nLrkostksa ij gh fopkj fd;k tk ldrk gSA

¶21

mijksDr fof/kd O;oLFkk ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu djs] rks okn i= ds vfHkdFkuksa esa mijksDr nkui= dk dksbZ mYys[k ugha gSA izfroknh }kjk tks cpko fy;k x;k gS] og rF;ksa dk fo"k; gSA Lo;a izfroknh

¶22

(3 of 3) [CR-10/2025]

¶23

[2025:RJ-JP:42897]

¶24

}kjk viuk dkmaVj Dyse izLrqr djrs gq, bl laifRr esa 1@3 fgLlk viuk rFkk 'ks"k 1@3 o 1@3 fgLlk vius nksuksa HkkbZ;ksa dk muds firk }kjk dfFkr :i ls tks ekSf[kd fgCck fd;k x;k gS] mlds vuqlkj gksuk crk;k gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa Lo;a izfroknh gh oknxzLr laifRr esa fdldk LokfeRo gS] bl ckcr~ iz'u ysdj vk;k gSA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa ;g lc fcUnq rF;ksa ls lacaf/kr gksus ds dkj.k ls fopkj.k ds mijkar gh r; gks ldrs gSa rFkk mBkbZ xbZ vkifRr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds Ldksi esa ugha vkrh gSA ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k iw.kZr% rF;ksa o fof/k ds vqu:i gS] mlesa dksbZ vfu;ferrk ;k voS/kkfudrk ugha gSA

¶25

ifj.kker% ;kph&izfroknh dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk vLohdkj dj [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 24-08-2023 dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA LFkxu vkosnu o vU; vkosnu] ;fn dksbZ yafcr gksa] rks os Hkh mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;s tkrs gSaA

¶26

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶27

DINESH KUMAWAT /03

Mohammad Iqbal S/O Mohammad Ismail v. Mohammad Ismail S/O Haji Nabibaksh

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Mohammad Iqbal S/O Mohammad Ismail v. Mohammad Ismail S/O Haji Nabibaksh

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dalip S/O Hanumanaram Vs Hanumanaram S/O Swarooparam

Nilesh Rawat Proprietor M/S Rawat Enterprises Vs Smt. Rekha Gupta Wife of Sh. Anil Gupta

Anil Kumar S/O Late Shri Ramswaroop Vs State of Rajasthan

Kailash Chand Meena S/O Shri Kishan Lal Meena, Vs Shri Subir Kumar

Gulam Rasool Khan Vs P Kumar

Smt. Indrakanwar W/O Late Shri Jaisingh Vs Rajesh Agarwal S/O Late Shri Krishnakant Agarwal