Partly allowed

Shrikrishna S/O Shri Narayan, v. Pitram Gurjar S/O Shri Chajuram Gurjar

Rajasthan HC8 Aug 2025CMA/4451/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

1st Single Judge dismissed the High Court civil appeal against a compensation order. The single Judge introduced a new formula to calculate the final compensation. The single Judge began calculating the compensation based on the new formula.

What did the court decide?

The 1st Single Judge dismissed the High Court civil appeal against a compensation order. The single Judge introduced a new formula to calculate the final compensation. The single Judge began calculati

Shrikrishna S/O Shri Narayan, Vs Pitram Gurjar… — Writ and Judicial Review | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:30833]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4451/2024

¶4

Shrikrishna S/o Shri Narayan, Aged 55 Years, R/o Jonaaycha Kalan, Tehsil Neemrana, District Alwar.

¶5

Santosh Devi W/o Shrikrishna, Aged 49 Years, R/o Jonaaycha Kalan, Tehsil Neemrana, District Alwar.

¶6

----Appellants

¶7

Versus

¶8

Pitram Gurjar S/o Shri Chajuram Gurjar, R/o Talukabas, Raghunathpura, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Driver Tractor No. Rj-52-Ra-2132)

¶9

Rakesh Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Radheyshyam Sharma, R/o Khatolai, Tehsil Viratnagar, District Jaipur (Registered Owner Tractor No. Rj-52-Ra-2132)

¶10

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Through Manager, Office Third Floor, Anand Bhawan, Sansar Chandra Road, Jaipur. (Insurance Tractor No. Rj-52-Ra-2132)

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ram Sharan Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Lokesh Parihar, Adv.

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶14

08/08/2025

¶15

vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku }kjk ;g vihy fo}ku eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k ,oa vij ftyk ,oa ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k la[;k&2] 'kkgiqjk] ftyk t;iqj }kjk Dyse vkosnu la[;k 9@2019 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o vokMZ fnukad 19-07-2024 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh] ftlds ek/;e ls vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku ds iq= dqanuyky dh okgu nq?kZVuk esa e`R;q gksus ds ifj.kkeLo:i dqy 9]47]432@& #i;s dk vokMZ e; 6 izfr'kr okf"kZd C;kt lfgr ikfjr fd;k x;k] ftlesa c<ksrjh fd;s tkus gsrq ;g vihy is'k dh x;h gSA

¶16

okgu Lokeh pkyd vFkok chek dEiuh dh vksj ls dksbZ vihy izLrqr ugha dh x;h gSA

[2025:RJ-JP:30833]

[CMA-4451/2024]

(2 of 3)

vihykFkhZx.k@nkosnkjku dk ;g fuosnu gS fd e`rd 19 o"kZ 10 ekg dh vk;q dk Fkk rFkk 12oha ikl Fkk] og lqijokbZtj ds :i esa dk;Z dj jgk Fkk] mldh ekfld vk; 15]000@& :i;s Fkh] ijUrq fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk bu rF;ksa dks Lohdkj ugha djrs gq, rF;kRed =qfV dh gS] bl lhek rd vk{ksfir vokMZ dks mikUrfjr djrs gq, ;Fkksfpr jkf'k fnyk;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶21

blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk chek dEiuh }kjk v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k ds fu.kZ; dks fof/k lEer gksuk crkrs gq;s vihy [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶22

nkSjku fopkj.k nkosnkjku dh vksj ls erd ds fu;kstd ykypUn 'kekZ dks crkSj lk{kh ijhf{kr djk;k gS ftlus vius dFkuksa esa tkfgj fd;k gS fd erd mldh QeZ esa lqijokbZtj Fkk vkSj mls 15]000@& :i;s ekfld osru fn;k tk jgk FkkA xokg us izn'kZ&10 izek.k i= dks iznf'kZr vo'; djk;k gS] ysfdu ml ij gLrk{kjdrkZ ds gLrk{kjksa dh iqf"V ugha dh gSA xokg ykypUn us viuh QeZ dk uke nso baQzkVsd gksuk crk;k gS] ijUrq bl QeZ ds jftLVªs'ku izek.k i= izn'kZ&12 esa vFkok mijksDr QeZ dh vk;dj fooj.kh esa ykypUn Hkkxhnkj gks] ,slk rF; izdV ugha gqvk gS] cfYd vka/kzizns'k ds llqcsyh uk;Mw dks gh Hkkxhnkj crk;k x;k gSA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa bl xokg ds dFkuksa ls e`rd dk mijksDr dk;Z esa fu;ksftr gksdj 15]000@& :i;s ekfld vk; gksuk izekf.kr ugha gSA

¶23

pwafd e`rd 12oha ikl Fkk rFkk dksbZ fMIyksek&fMxzh dk;Z djus ds laca/k esa ugha Fkh] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa vfHkdfFkr vk; izekf.kr ugha gSA fo}ku fopkj.k vf/kdj.k }kjk mls vdq'ky Jfed ekurs gq, mldh izfrfnu etnwjh 213@&:i;s ekuh gS tks iw.kZr% mfpr gSA

¶24

fdUrq U;kf;d n`"Vkar ¼2018½ 1 ,llhlh 746 y{eh/kj uk;d cuke tqxy fd'kksj] ¼2008½ 12 ,llhlh 165 y{eh nsoh o vU; cuke eksgEen rckj o vU; ,oa 2022 ¼3½ Mh,uts 1160 yhykjke cuke ns'kjkt ds ekeys esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd izfrdj dh x.kuk djrs le; 26 fnu

[2025:RJ-JP:30833]

[CMA-4451/2024]

(3 of 3)

dh U;wure etnwjh ds LFkku ij 30 fnu dh etnwjh jkf'k dks fopkj esa fy;k tkuk visf{kr gSA

¶29

pwafd e`rd vfookfgr Fkk] vr% Lo;a ds thfor jgus ij O;fDrxr [kpsZ ds :i esa 1@2 fgLlk jkf'k de fd;k tkuk mfpr gS] rnuqlkj vdq'ky Jfed dh etnwjh nj ds vuqlkj 30 fnu dh etnwjh jkf'k ds fglkc ls izfrdj jkf'k dh x.kuk dh tkos] rks vk; dh gkfu 213x12x30x18x1@2= 6]90]120@& #i;s gksrh gS ftl ij Hkfo"; dh izR;k'kk ds en esa 40 izfr'kr jkf'k 2]76]048@& :i;s tksMs tkus ij ;g jkf'k 9]66]168@& :i;s curh gS] tcfd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk bl en esa 8]37]432@& :i;s fnyk;s x;s gSa] bl izdkj vk; dh gkfu ds en esa vihykFkhZx.k 1]28]736@& :i;s vfrfjDr izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSaA

¶30

vU; enksa ds laca/k esa v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk fnyk;h x;h jkf'k i;kZIr gS ftlesa gLr{ksi fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA

¶31

mijksDr foospukuqlkj tks v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk tks vokMZ ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] mlds vfrfjDr [email protected] 1]28]736@& :i;s i`Fkd ls izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSaA

¶32

mijksDr foospukuqlkj vihykFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vihy vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj dh tkdj v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr vokMZ o fu.kZ; fnukafdr 19-07-2024 dks mikUrfjr djrs gq, vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk ikfjr vokMZ jkf'k ds vfrfjDr bl vkns'k ds rgr vihykFkhZx.k 1]28]736@& :i;s rFkk ml ij v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k esa ;kfpdk lafLFkr fd;s tkus dh fnukad ls olwyh rd 6 izfr'kr lk/kkj.k okf"kZd C;kt dh nj ls jkf'k izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gksaxsA

¶33

v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k dk vfHkys[k ;fn izkIr gks j[kk gS rks vkns'k dh izfr ds lkFk vfoyEc ykSVk;k tkosA

¶34

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶35

Mittal /39

Shrikrishna S/O Shri Narayan, v. Pitram Gurjar S/O Shri Chajuram Gurjar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shrikrishna S/O Shri Narayan, v. Pitram Gurjar S/O Shri Chajuram Gurjar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vivek Vs Ms Rajasthan Perfumery Work Pvt. Ltd.

Pawan Kumar S/O Shri Kamlesh Vs Mohan Lal S/O Ganeshram

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs Smt. Manisha Wife of Late Vijay Kumar

Rampati Devi W/O Late Sh. Jagdish Prasad Vs Firoj Khan S/O Nazir Khan

Manager R S R T C and Anr. Vs Pooran Verma and Anr.

Smt. Jyoti Jain W/O Late Shri Rakesh Kumar Jain Vs Mukesh Khandelwal S/O Shri P.D. Gupta