Dismissed

Jagdish Prasad S/O Shri Hukama Ram v. Sh. Sudhansh Patn

Rajasthan HC6 Oct 2025CCP/886/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner alleged non-compliance of a writ order granting him monetary benefits and sought promotion to Deputy Transport Commissioner. The court held the order had been complied with via review DPCs; following Supreme Court precedent it held contempt not maintainable where substantial compliance exists, and dismissed the contempt petition while leaving him free to pursue fresh proceedings.

What the court decided

AI extract

Jagdish Prasad S/O Shri Hukama Ram Vs Sh. Sudhansh Patn — Contempt of Court | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:40438]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 886/2023

¶4

Jagdish Prasad S/o Shri Hukama Ram, Aged About 67 Years, Resident Of 6/300, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Sh. Sudhansh Patn, Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

Dr. Manisha Arora, Transport Commissioner, Government Of Rajasthan, Privahan Bhawan, Sahkar Marg, Jaipur.

¶9

Smt. Shreya Guha, Addl. Chief Secretary, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶10

Shri Hemant Gera, Principal Secretary, Department Of Personal, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat Jaipur.

¶11

State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Saxena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh Naruka, AAG with Mr. Hamir Singh Shekhawat, Adv.

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶15

Judgment / Order

¶16

06/10/2025

¶17

voekuuk ;kfpdk ij nksuksa i{kksa dks lquk x;k] vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶18

;kph ifjogu foHkkx] jktLFkku jkT; ljdkj esa dkfeZd ds :i esa fu;qDr Fkk] mldh fnukad 01-04-2005 ls 16-12-2005 dh vof/k ds fy,

[CCP-886/2023]

[2025:RJ-JP:40438]

(2 of 3)

okf"kZd xksiuh; izfrosnu esa izfrdwy izfof"V lacaf/kr vf/kdkjh }kjk dh xbZ Fkh] ftls ,dyihB flfoy fjV ;kfpdk la[;k 3444@2013 ds ek/;e pqukSrh fn;s tkus ij vkns'k fnukad 25-07-2023 ds ek/;e ls bl izfrdwy izfof"V dks vikLr djrs gq, ikfj.kkfed ykHk fn;s tkus dk vkns'k fn;k x;kA

¶23

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph dk fuosnu gS fd mijksDr vkns'k dh ikyuk esa mls ,d inksUufr fjO;w Mh-ih-lh- djrs gq, iqjkuh rkjh[k ls nh xbZ ysfdu i'pkr~orhZ inksUufr iznku ugha dh xbZ gS] tcfd og vij ifjogu vk;qDr ds in ij inksUur gksus ;ksX; FkkA

¶24

fo}ku vfrfjDr egkf/koDrk }kjk izLrqr fd;s x;s tokc ds vuqlj.k esa ;g rdZ fn;k x;k fd ;kph vkxkeh inksUufr gsrq vko';d lsokof/k o ;ksX;rkvksa dh iwfrZ ugha djrk Fkk] bl dkj.k ls mls inksUufr ugha nh xbZ rFkk vc og lsokfuo`Ùk gks pqdk gS rFkk mldk ekeyk le;≤ ij ,d ls vf/kd fjO;w Mh-ih-lh- esa ijhf{kr gks pqdk gSA

¶25

vfHkys[k ds voyksdu ls Li"V gS fd vkns'k dh ikyuk esa fjO;w Mh-ih-lh- djrs gq, foHkkx }kjk iwoZ dh frfFk ls inksUufr ;kph dks nh xbZ gS] vkxkeh o ofj"B in ij inksUufr ds laca/k esa vLohdkj djus ds vyx&vyx dkj.k crk;s x;s gSaA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Midnapore Peoples' Co-op. Bank Ltd. & Ors. versus Chunilal Nanda & Ors. AIR 2006 SC 2190 esa ;g O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh gS fd U;k;ky; }kjk tks vkns'k fn;k x;k gS ;fn mldh lkjr% ikyuk gks pqdh gS rFkk vU; dksbZ O;k[;k gks ldrh gS] ek= bl vk/kkj ij voekuuk ;kfpdk iks"k.kh; ugha gS] vfirq u;s okn dkj.k ds vk/kkj ij ubZ ;kfpdk izLrqr dh tk ldrh gSA

[CCP-886/2023]

[2025:RJ-JP:40438]

(3 of 3)

;fn orZeku ekeys esa Hkh vkxkeh inksUufr esa ;kph dks vU; dkj.kksa ls ;ksX; ugha ekuk x;k gS] rks mlds laca/k esa og u;s fljs ls mipkj izkIr djus gsrq Lora= gSA pwafd orZeku voekuuk ;kfpdk vc iks"k.kh; ugha gS] vr% mijksDr Lora=rk iznku djrs gq, ;g voekuuk ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk foi{khx.k dks tkjh'kqnk uksfVl lekIr fd;s tkrs gSaA

¶30

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶31

DINESH KUMAWAT /196 (S)

Jagdish Prasad S/O Shri Hukama Ram v. Sh. Sudhansh Patn

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Jagdish Prasad S/O Shri Hukama Ram v. Sh. Sudhansh Patn

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Haider Ali S/O Shri Najar Mohammed, Vs Jubeda Hanifi W/O Marhoom Jafar Mohammed

Suresh Chandra Mahamana Son of Late Shri Samaliya Ram @ Samal Das, Vs Hemlata Singh Wife of Shri Chandra Shekhar Singh

Ghanshyam Aacharya Son of Gopilal Acharya, Vs Premchand Bakaliwal Son of Kanhaiyalal Bakliwal

Jagdish S/O Shri Ghasi Vs M/S V.N. Buildtech Private Limited

Smt. John Silviya Thomas W/O Shri Moris Thomas, Vs Anil Viliyamsan S/O Late Shri Moris Viliyamsan

Mahaveer Prasad Son of Pusa Ram, Vs Brig. Salil Pandey, Adjudant General Chairman