The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed a criminal contempt petition (S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 139/2022) without holding an inquiry, noting the petitioner is serving a jail term and no active charge remains.
Contempt petition dismissed without holding any inquiry or recording arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:40391]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 139/2022
Mahaveer Prasad Son Of Pusa Ram, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Near Plot No. 16/a Police Line, Maha Deo Nagar, Ajmer Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None Present. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishwanath Karan Rathore, Adv. Mr. Shivendra S. Rathore, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order
06/10/2025
;kph i{k dh vksj ls dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk foi{kh }kjk fnukad 12-05-2022 ds vkns'k dh izfr izLrqr djrs gq, fuosnu fd;k fd U;k;ky; ds vkns'k fnukad 04-01-2022 dh ikyuk esa ;kph dks dk;ZHkkj xzgu djus dh vuqefr nh tk pqdh Fkh] vkns'k dh ikyuk gks pqdh gSA ;g Hkh fuosnu fd;k fd vc ;kph dh eR;q gks pqdh gS] ftldk eR;q izek.k i= Hkh izLrqr fd;k x;k] ftls vfHkys[k ij fy;k tkrk gSA
pwafd vkt ;kph i{k mifLFkr ugha gS rFkk foi{kh }kjk vkns'k dh ikyuk gksuk crk;k gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa ;g ;kfpdk vLohdkj dj [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA LFkxu vkosnu o vU; vkosnu] ;fn dksbZ yafcr gksa] rks os mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;s tkrs gSaA
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
DINESH KUMAWAT /43
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be dismissed as no substantive issue remains.
Whether the petitioner is serving jail term as required for contempt dismissal.
Mahaveer Prasad
Brig. Salil Pandey
Ashok Kumar Sharma
Uma Shanker Vyas
Dinesh Kumawat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
