Dismissed

Ghanshyam Aacharya Son of Gopilal Acharya, v. Premchand Bakaliwal Son of Kanhaiyalal Bakliwal

Rajasthan HC3 Oct 2025CR/249/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Revision against rejection of an Order VII Rule 11 CPC application to reject a permanent injunction suit concerning a mining lease agreement allegedly expired in 2022. The High Court held the plea of expiry was a matter of evidence and cause of action was disclosed; revision dismissed and impugned order upheld.

What did the court decide?

Civil revision dismissed; order dated 25-07-2024 rejecting Order VII Rule 11 CPC application affirmed; pending applications disposed.

Ghanshyam Aacharya Son of Gopilal Acharya, Vs Premchand… — Property and Title | Rajasthan HC (2025)

¶1

[2025:RJ-JP:40130]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 249/2024

¶4

Ghanshyam Aacharya Son Of Gopilal Acharya, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of Sarwad Teshil Sarwad District Ajmer, Rajasthan.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Premchand Bakaliwal Son Of Kanhaiyalal Bakliwal, Aged About 77 Years, Resident Of D-143 A Savitri Path, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur, Raj.

¶8

Nitin Bagada Son Of Gajendra Bagada, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of13, Jaishree Nagar, Amit Bhardwaj Marg, Sector 8, Malvia Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶9

Prateek Baj Son Of Pawan Kumar Baj, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of D-146, Chandan Bhawan, Savitri Path, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur, Raj.

¶10

Assistant Mineral Engineer, Department Of Mines And Geology, Tonk, Civil Lines, Tonk, District Tonk, Raj.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ganga Ram Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaswant Persoya, Adv.

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS

¶14

Judgment / Order

¶15

03/10/2025

¶16

;kph&izfroknh Øe&1 dh vksj ls ;g flfoy fuxjkuh ;kfpdk fo}ku ofj"B flfoy U;k;k/kh'k VksMkjk;flag] ftyk&Vksad }kjk nhokuh okn la[;k&23@2024 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 25-07-2024 ls O;fFkr

[CR-249/2024]

[2025:RJ-JP:40130]

(2 of 3)

gksdj is'k dh] ftlds ek/;e ls ;kph&izfroknh Øe&1 dk vkosnu varxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- [kkfjt fd;k x;kA

¶21

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&izfroknh Øe&1 rFkk v;kphx.k dh cgl lquh] vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶22

lqlaxr rF; ;g gS fd oknh&v;kph Øe&1 dh vksj ls fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk dk okn izLrqr dj vfHkdfFkr fd;k fd mlds i{k esa [kuu iVVk tkjh gqvk Fkk] [kuu dk;Z djus gsrq vkfnukFkZ ekbZUl ,.M feujYl ds i{k esa eq[R;kjkukek fu"ikfnr fd;k FkkA bl QeZ esa oknh rFkk izfroknh Øe&2 o 3 Hkkxhnkj gSa] o"kZ 2022 rd [kuu dk;Z pyrk jgk ysfdu vc vdsyk izfroknh Øe&1 voS/k :i ls [kuu dk;Z djus ij vkeknk gS] bl ckcr LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk pkghA

¶23

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&izfroknh Øe&1 dh vksj ls fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k ,d vkosnu varxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- izLrqr dj oknh dks dksbZ okn dkj.k mRiUu ugha gksuk crkrs gq, okn ukeatwj fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;k] tks vk{ksfir vkns'k ds ek/;e ls vLohdkj gqvkA

¶24

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&izfroknh Øe&1 dh vksj ls U;kf;d fu.kZ; M/S Reliance Cement Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Manminder Singh and Ors. izLrqr djrs gq, fuosnu fd;k fd dfFkr eq[R;kjukek o"kZ 2022 esa gh fujLr gks pqdk gS] bl rF; dks Nqikrs gq, oknh }kjk okn izLrqr fd;k gS] oknh dks dksbZ okn dkj.k mRiUu ugha gqvk gSA blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk v;kphx.k dh vksj ls mijksDr rdksZa dks vLohdkj djrs gq, fuosnu fd;k fd eq[R;kjukek fujLr gksus dk dfFkr rF; lk{; ls r; gksxkA mudk ;g Hkh fuosnu gS fd vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- dk vkosnu fu.khZr gksrs le; okn esa of.kZr rF; gh lqlaxr gSaA var esa vk{ksfir vkns'k

¶25

(3 of 3) [CR-249/2024]

¶26

[2025:RJ-JP:40130]

¶27

dks fof/klEer gksuk crkrs gq, fuxjkuh ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶28

ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Eldeco Housing and Industries Ltd. Vs. Ashok Vidyarthi and Ors. (2024) 11 SCC 503 o Soumitra Kumar Sen Vs. Shyamal Kumar Sen & Ors. (2018) 5 SCC 644 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds vkosnu ij fopkj djrs le; ek= oknh ds vfHkdFkuksa o okni= ds lkFk izLrqr nLrkostksa ij gh fopkj fd;k tk ldrk gSA

¶29

mijksDr fu.kZ; ds izdk'k esa okni= esa of.kZr vfHkdFkuksa dk voyksdu fd;k tkos rks mlesa dfFkr eq[R;kjukek fujLr djus dk dksbZ rF; mYysf[kr ugha gS] ;g fcanq lk{; dk gks ldrk gSA okn esa of.kZr vfHkdFkuksa ds vk/kkj ij okn dkj.k mRiUu ugha gqvk gks] ,slh fLFkfr ugha gSA fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk lHkh rF;ksa dks fopkj esa ysus ds mijkar vk{ksfir vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gS] tks iw.kZr% rF;ksa o fof/k ds vuq:i gS] mlesa dksbZ gLr{ksi fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA

¶30

ifj.kker% ;kph&izfroknh Øe&1 dh vksj ls izLrqr fuxjkuh ;kfpdk vLohdkj dj [kkfjt dh tkrh gS rFkk vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 25-07-2024 dh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA LFkxu vkosnu o vU; vkosnu] ;fn dksbZ yafcr gksa] rks os Hkh mDrkuqlkj fuLrkfjr fd;s tkrs gSaA

¶31

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶32

DINESH KUMAWAT /50

Ghanshyam Aacharya Son of Gopilal Acharya, v. Premchand Bakaliwal Son of Kanhaiyalal Bakliwal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ghanshyam Aacharya Son of Gopilal Acharya, v. Premchand Bakaliwal Son of Kanhaiyalal Bakliwal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Renu Gas Agency Vs General Public

Neeraj Kumar S/O Shri Narayan Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs Govind Narayan Mishra S/O Shri Bhorelal Mishra

Haider Ali S/O Shri Najar Mohammed, Vs Jubeda Hanifi W/O Marhoom Jafar Mohammed

Suresh Chandra Mahamana Son of Late Shri Samaliya Ram @ Samal Das, Vs Hemlata Singh Wife of Shri Chandra Shekhar Singh

Jagdish S/O Shri Ghasi Vs M/S V.N. Buildtech Private Limited