Contempt petition disposed of as infructuous because the impugned order had been complied with by the respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2025:RJ-JP:6707]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1085/2023
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Zaid-ul-Haq, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.S. Chhaba, AAG.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order
14/02/2025
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the order dated 13.01.2023 of which contempt is alleged has been complied with. Hence, the contempt petition has been rendered infructuous.
The contempt petition is disposed of accordingly.
Notices stand discharged.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
AVINASH GULERIA /47
Lokendra Singh
Hari Prasad
State Of Rajasthan
Shri Kana Ram
Shri Rajesh Saxena
Shri Arvind Sharma
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
