Contempt petition alleging non-compliance with an order dated 06.08.2019. The state submitted compliance had been effected by a fresh order dated 12.02.2025, rendering the petition infructuous; it was disposed of and notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1259/2023
Kalulal Bateda S/o Shri Udairam, Aged About 45 Years, R/o 25, Jyoti Nagar Vistar, Bhilwada (Raj.) Presently Posted Lecturer English, Govt. Se. Secondary School, Mangrop, Bhilwada.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : By Post For Respondent(s) : Mr. B. S. Chhaba, AAG with Ms. Shruti Pareek, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
13/02/2025
Learned Additional Advocate General submits that order dated 06.08.2019 of which contempt is alleged, has been complied with vide order dated 12.02.2025.Thus, the contempt petition has been rendered infructuous. The copy of the order dated 12.02.2025 is taken on record.
The contempt petition is disposed of accordingly.
Notices stand discharged.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Gourav51
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition remained necessary given that the underlying order dated 06.08.2019 has been complied with by order dated 12.02.2025?
Kalulal Bateda
Pawan Kumar Goyal
Kanaram
Dharmendra Jatav
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
