The State sought restoration of a writ petition dismissed on a pre-emptory compliance order. Noting service on respondent No.3 was awaited, the court allowed the restoration application and restored the writ petition to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 611/2024
In
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10700/2011
State Of Rajasthan, Through Sub- Registrar Bhiwadi, District Alwar.
---- Applicant/Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Applicant(s) : Mr. Kartekeya Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Sandeep Taneja, Additional Advocate General
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order
15/07/2024
(2 of 2) [WRES-611/2024]
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ
SANJAY KUMAWAT /47
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition dismissed for non-compliance should be restored to its original number.
State of Rajasthan, through Sub-Registrar Bhiwadi, District Alwar
Rajasthan Tax Board Ajmer, Rajasthan
Collector Stamps, Alwar
M/s. Piyush Colonizers Limited
Sundry Real Project India Limited
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
