Rajasthan Paryatan Vikas Nigam v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged a 1997 notification imposing surcharge on beer closing stock. Court held petition infructuous due to efflux of time and disposed of it, allowing revival if cause of action survives.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of as infructuous due to efflux of time; liberty to move for revival.