The High Court allowed the petitioner's application to restore a writ petition previously dismissed for non-compliance with a deadline to file documents, noting the delay was due to bonafide error and the prayer was unopposed.
Restoration of the writ petition at its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JD:21911]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Restoration No. 36/2024
Deva Ram S/o Choutharam, Aged About 68 Years, R/o- Village Jhuntha, Tehsil Raipur District Pali
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Jai Kishan Bhaiya |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. D.S. Udawat |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
15/05/2024
(2 of 2)
[2024:RJ-JD:21911]
[WRES-36/2024]
within time. He, therefore, prays that the present restoration application may be allowed.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
295-/Arun P/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition should be restored upon the petitioner satisfying bonafide error regarding non-filing of requisite documents.
Whether the restoration application against dismissal for non-compliance without opposition should be allowed.
Deva Ram S/o Choutharam
Additional District Collector, Pali
Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Jhuntha
Gram Panchayat Jhuntha
Smt. Susila W/o Kalu Puri
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
