Pukh Raj v. Pratap Ram
Case brief
What is this about?
This order directs the trial Court to decide a pending application for interim injunction under Order 39 Rule 2(A) read with Section 151 CPC within six weeks.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the trial Court to decide the pending interim injunction application within six weeks.
What the court decided
[2024:RJ-JD:21529]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2234/2024
Pukh Raj S/o Sh. Madhu Ram, Aged About 51 Years, By Caste Meghwal, R/o Village - Hariyadhana, Tehsil Bilara, District - Jodhpur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
- Pratap Ram S/o Mangi Lal.
- Mangi Lal S/o Mugana Ram.
- Bhanwar Lal S/o Rawat Ram, Resident of Village - Hariyadhana, Tehsil Bilara, District Jodhpur (Raj.).
- Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Hariyadhana, Tehsil- Bilara, District- Jodhpur.
- Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Bilara, District Jodhpur.
- State of Rajasthan, through District Collector, Jodhpur.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial Court be directed to decide a pending interim injunction application at the earliest?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pukh Raj
- respondent
Pratap Ram
- respondent
Mangi Lal
- respondent
Bhanwar Lal
- respondent
Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Hariyadhana
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/2234/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court