A D.B. Special Appeal challenging an order reached via party consent was dismissed for lack of maintainability as no ground was urged disputing the consent. The appellant was directed to seek alternative remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:6182-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1348/2022
Rishikesh Maharishi S/o Dr. Rajendra Prasad Maharishi, R/o Plot No. - 159, Santosh Nagar, T.N. Mishra Marg, Nirman Nagar, Jaipur.
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ravi Sharma, Adv.
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI Order
06/02/2024
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA), ACTING CJ
Brijesh/AMIT/25
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal is maintainable when the impugned order was based on party consent and no ground is urged challenging such consent.
Rishikesh Maharishi
Roop Singh Bhati
Rajhans Pvt. I.T.I.
Jaipur Development Authority
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
