Habeas corpus petition dismissed as infructuous on the information that the corpus had expired. No substantive points were argued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:47201-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 228/2024
Kamlesh Devi W/o Gopal Bagoriya, Aged About 35 Years, R/oMo-Khatikwara, Vpo- Kotkasim, District Khairthal Tijara (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ghanshyam Dass For State : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG
Mr. Nand Lal, S.I., S.H.O. Police Station Kotkasim, present in person.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order
18/11/2024
It is informed by counsel appearing for the petitioner that corpus has expired and the present habeas corpus petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above, the present Habeas Corpus Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
AMIT/44
Kamlesh Devi
State of Rajasthan
Pankaj Bhandari
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
