Complainant-appellant challenged the acquittal of Chandrajeet and Rajendra who were alleged to be present during a murder. The High Court dismissed the appeal, holding there was no evidence placing the accused at the crime scene despite a conviction against another accomplice.
The appeal filed by the complainant-appellant is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:47213-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Criminal Appeal (Db) No. 372/2023
Jaypal S/o Shri Mularam, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Dudiyo Ki Dhani Khirod Police Station Nawalgarh District. Jhunjhunu Raj.
----Complainant/Appellant
Versus
----Accused-Respondents
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. Arpan Kumar Sharma |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, G.A. cum AAG |
| Mr. Amar Kumar, AAAG |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
18/11/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:47213-DB]
[CRLAD-372/2023]
(2 of 2)
learned Sessions Judge has erred in acquitting Chandrajeet and Rajendra. It is contended that Fawda which was used for burying the dead body was recovered at the instance of Chandrajeet alias Leelu.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
LAKSHYA-DAKSH/47
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal against acquittal of accused Chandrajeet and Rajendra can be allowed given the lack of evidence connecting them to the commission of the offence.
Whether the alleged recovery of the body and the 'Fawda' at the instance of the respondents sufficiently connects them to the crime under challenge.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jaypal
State Of Rajasthan
Chandrajeet
Rajendra
Pankaj Bhandari
Shubha Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
