A civil writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the matter had become infructuous by the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 866/2024
----Petitioners
Versus
[CW-866/2024]
(2 of 2)
(Rajasthan)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitesh Pareek, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order
02/05/2024
Counsel for the petitioners submits that by efflux of time, this petition has become infructuous.
Dismissed as rendered infructuous. Stay application and all applications (pending, if any) also stand dismissed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J
MR/145
Bhagchand Soni (sui juris) / Shambhu Dayal S/o Late Shri Bhagchand Ji
Manakchand Jain (sui juris) / Paras Kanwawr / Gyanchand Jain / Maina D/o / Sangeeta D/o / Khushbu D/o
Assistant Engineer, Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Mandal
Nayab Tehsildar, Vijaynagar
Ashok Kumar S/o Late Shri Bhagchand Ji
Geeta Devi / Kanta Devi / Gayatri Devi / Savitri Devi / Manoj Kumari
Anoop Kumar Dhand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
