Disposed

Girraj Prasad Sharma S/O Shri Ram Swaroop Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC27 May 2024CW/8544/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Division Bench disposed of the writ petition, granting liberty to petitioners to submit a representation. Respondents are directed to consider the claim, pass an appropriate order within two months, and pass consequential benefits as per the directions in the connected matter of Ramesh Chander Gupta and relevant Supreme Court orders.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file representation; respondents directed to pass appropriate orders and release payable amounts within one month.

Girraj Prasad Sharma S/O Shri Ram Swaroop… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8544/2024

¶3

Girraj Prasad Sharma S/o Shri Ram Swaroop Sharma, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Chota Bazar, Purani Tonk, District Tonk Rajasthan.

¶4

Prakash Chand Garg S/o Shri Damodar Garg, Aged About 74 Years, R/o Raghunathpuri, Bada Takhta Vtc Tonk, District Tonk.

¶5

Satya Prakash Sharma S/o Shri Gajadhar Prasad, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Umed Bagh, Malpura Darwaja Purani Tonk, Tonk Rajasthan.

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶9

State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶10

State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Agriculture, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶11

Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶12

Director Medical And Health Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶13

Chief Medical And Health Officer, Tonk.

¶14

Director Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.

¶15

District Education Elementary Education, Tonk.

¶16

Commissioner, Commissionerate Of Agriculture, Panch Krishi Bhawan, Janpath, C-Scheme, Jaipur.

¶17

Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶18

----Respondents

¶19

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Malpura

¶20

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Judgment / Order

¶21

27/05/2024

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by

¶23

[CW-8544/2024]

¶24

(2 of 4)

¶25

the Division Bench judgment in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2800/2021) and other connected matters, decided on 17.10.2023 .

¶26

In these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to approach respondent/s by way of filing representation for redressal of their grievances in the light of judgment rendered by this court in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra) .

¶27

In the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra) , the Division Bench of this Court inter-alia while referring to orders passed in Union of India & Ors. Vs. Manohar Lal & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5445/2022, decided on 07.08.2023 & The Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. Vs. Ram Karan Bhakar & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4139/2022 as well as judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors. Vs. C.P. Mundinamani & Ors.: 2023 SCC online SC 401, has passed the following directions:-

¶28

“It is also brought to the notice of this Court that Special Leave Petition (C) No. 3420/2023 and Special Leave Petition (C) No. 1011/2023 have also been disposed off on 19.05.2023. A copy of the orders dated 11.04.2023 and 19.05.2023 passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court have also been placed on record. Therefore, the present petitions are also disposed off on the same terms with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders and other consequential benefits as per their entitlement. Whatever amount is found payable be also released within a period of one month. Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of.”

¶29

[CW-8544/2024]

¶30

(3 of 4)

¶31

Ordered accordingly.

¶32

In the event of filing representation by the petitioners, the respondent/s shall consider the claim of the petitioners and pass an appropriate order within two months from the date of receipt of representation with certified copy of this order and that too in accordance with law and the observations made in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), read with order dated 11.04.2023 in SLP(C) No. 3420/2023 and order dated 19.05.2023 in SLP(C) No. 1011/2023 passed by Hon’ble Apex Court, as has been referred in the case of C.P. Mundinamani & Ors. (supra).

¶33

The present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶34

The order has been passed based on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the averments made in the writ petition. The respondent/s would be at liberty to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the writ petition in the light of the observations made by the Division Bench of this court in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra) , and only in case the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioners be extended the relief as prayed with consequential benefits as ordered in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), read with order dated 11.04.2023 in SLP(C) No. 3420/2023 and order dated 19.05.2023 in SLP(C) No. 1011/2023 passed by Hon’ble Apex Court, as has been referred in the case of C.P. Mundinamani & Ors. (supra).

¶35

[CW-8544/2024]

¶36

(4 of 4)

¶37

Since the main petition has been disposed of, the stay application and the pending application/s, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶38

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶39

GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /18

Girraj Prasad Sharma S/O Shri Ram Swaroop Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Girraj Prasad Sharma S/O Shri Ram Swaroop Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chander Ram @ Ram Chander and Ors. Vs State

Rahul Meena S/O Omprakash Meena Vs the State of Rajasthan

Neetu Kanwar D/O Shri Laxman Singh Rathore Vs State of Rajasthan

Gurmit Singh Son of Shri Rajendra Singh Vs Akhil Bhartiya Takniki Shiksha Parishad

Trilok Chand Sharma S/O Late Shri Mahesh Chand Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Sohan Lal Tuteja S/O Shri Prabhu Dayal Tuteja, Vs State of Rajasthan