Writ petition by a candidate contesting her exclusion from judicial services selection; sealed-cover result showed she failed to secure minimum qualifying marks in the written examination, making the issue academic.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:43401-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7665/2024
Sunita Meena D/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o 1-D-140, Meena Colony, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur Rajasthan. (Roll No. 147095).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Himanshu Jain Advocate with Mr. Rishi Raj Maheshwari Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Vishnu Kant Sharma Advocate.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
16/10/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:43401-DB]
[CW-7665/2024]
has failed to secure the minimum qualifying marks in the written examination and, therefore, even if the entire case of the petitioner is accepted, the petitioner is not entitled to participate in the further process of selection up to the stage of interview and stands disqualified despite the fact that she was provisionally allowed to appear in the written examination.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ
MANOJ NARWANI-RAHUL /192
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunita Meena
Rajasthan High Court
Registrar (Examination), Rajasthan High Court
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
