PIL challenged grant of Patta to two private respondents. The High Court held the petitioner had an alternative remedy of appeal before the Competent Authority under the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956, and dismissed the PIL without commenting on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:43381-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil (PIL) Writ Petition No. 15014/2024
Rajendra Gurjar S/o Shri Devi Lal Gurjar, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Ram Nagar, Patel Colony, Vijay Nagar, District Beawar
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Bhardwaj, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG with Ms. Shikha Sharma, Advocate
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
16/10/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:43381-DB]
[CW-15014/2024]
(2 of 2)
appeal before the Competent Authority against grant of patta rather than filing the present writ petition (PIL) before this Court. 4. Without commenting anything on merits of the case, the present PIL is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ
Sanjay Kumawat/Ashish Kumar/53
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a PIL is maintainable challenging grant of patta when an appellate remedy exists under the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajendra Gurjar S/o Shri Devi Lal Gurjar
State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department
District Collector, Beawar
Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Vijay Nagar, District Beawar
Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Vijay Nagar, District Beawar
Tehsildar, Vijay Nagar, District Beawar
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
