Ladoo Lal Jain v. Central Bank of India and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner's counsel submitted that the matter had become infructuous. The Court dismissed the writ petition on that ground.
The petitioner's counsel submitted that the matter had become infructuous. The Court dismissed the writ petition on that ground.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:49503]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6353/2005
Ladoo Lal Jain, Son Of Shri C.M. Jain, Resident of Village DeoliaKalan, Via Bijaynagar, District Ajmer Rajasthan Presently He Is Residing At The House No. 349, Himmat Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur Rajasthan, Retired Senior Manager, Central Bank Of India, Regional Office, Jaipur Rajasthan
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Mr. Ram |
Singh Gurjar for |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Nemi | Chand Choudhary | |
| For Respondent(s) | : None |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
02/12/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter
has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
DEEPAK/113
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous?
Ladoo Lal Jain
Central Bank Of India, Central Office
Central Bank Of India, Regional Office, Jaipur
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court