Disposed

Mahveer Singh S/O Shri Bhagirath Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 Jan 2024CW/622/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Division Bench disposed of the writ petition by directing respondents to consider the petitioner's claim and pass an appropriate order in accordance with the observations made in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta. Liberty was granted to file a representation.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to file a representation; respondents to consider claim and pass appropriate order; writ petition disposed.

Mahveer Singh S/O Shri Bhagirath… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 622/2023

¶3

Mahveer Singh S/o Shri Bhagirath Singh, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Plot No. 5, New Colony, Opposite Police Check Post, Harmara, Jaipur, (Rajasthan)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Of Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶7

Police Commissioner, Police Commissionerate Head Quarter, Government Hostel Circle, C-Scheme, Jaipur.

¶8

Director Treasury And Accounts Department, Sawai Jai Singh Highway, Bani Park, Jaipur (Raj.)

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Brahma Prakash on behalf of Mr. Ravi Kant Agarwal For Respondent(s) :

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶12

Judgment / Order

¶13

16/01/2024

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by the judgment of Division Bench in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2800/2021) and other connected matters, decided on 17.10.2023 .

¶15

In these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to approach respondent/s by way of filing a representation for redressal of his grievances in the light of

¶16

[CW-622/2023]

¶17

(2 of 3)

¶18

judgment rendered by this court in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra).

¶19

In the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra) , Division Bench of this Court inter-alia while referring to orders passed in Union of India & Ors. Vs. Manohar Lal & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5445/2022, dediced on 07.08.2023 & the Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. Vs. Ram Karan Bhakar & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4139/2022 as well as judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors. Vs. C.P. Mundinamani & Ors.: 2023 SCC online SC 401 has passed the following directions:-

¶20

“It is also brought to the notice of this Court that Special Leave Petition (C) No. 3420/2023 and Special Leave Petition (C) No. 1011/2023 have also been disposed off on 19.05.2023. A copy of the orders dated 11.04.2023 and 19.05.2023 passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court have also been placed on record. Therefore, the present petitions are also disposed off on the same terms with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders and other consequential benefits as per their entitlement. Whatever amount is found payable be also released within a period of one month. Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of.”

¶21

Ordered accordingly.

¶22

In the event of filing a representation by the petitioner, the respondent/s shall consider the claim of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law and the observations made in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra). The writ petition stands disposed of.

¶23

[CW-622/2023]

¶24

The order has been passed on the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the averments made in the writ petition. The respondent/s would be at liberty to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the writ petition in the light of the observations made by the Division Bench of this court in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta , and only in case the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner be extended the relief as prayed with consequential benefits as ordered in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta .

¶25

Since the main petition has been disposed of, stay application and all pending application/s, if any, to dispose.

¶26

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶27

Gaurav Srivastava/48

Mahveer Singh S/O Shri Bhagirath Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahveer Singh S/O Shri Bhagirath Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudhir Kumar Yadav S/O Shri Balbir Singh Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikram Singh Yadav S/O Shri Kaluram Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Arun Prakash Sharma Son of Shri Subedar Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Rameshwar Prasad Sharma Son of Shri Tundaram Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Parmil @ Praveen S/O Hariram Vs State of Rajasthan

Pawan Kumar Sharma S/O Shri Deendayal Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan