Service-benefit dispute over the date of initial Government appointment. Both sides agreed the issue was covered by a Co-ordinate Bench order; the Court directed respondents to allow benefits counting appointment from 25.03.1997, including selection scale and consequential benefits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:2267]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 476/2023
Vikram Singh Yadav S/o Shri Kaluram Yadav, Aged About 49 Years, Presently Residing At Googariya, Alwar, Basai, Rajasthan301709.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
| For Petitioner(s) | : Ms. |
Mahi Yadav |
|---|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. |
C.L. Saini, AAG with Ms. Shrejna |
| Shr | esth |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Judgment / Order
12/01/2024
State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.555/2005) , decided on 07.11.2006.
[2024:RJ-JP:2267] (2 of 2)
[CW-476/2023]
also be disposed in same terms and directions as given in case of Jorawar Singh (supra) .
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
ARTI SHARMA /340
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to service benefits by reckoning his initial appointment from 25.03.1997, as in Jorawar Singh.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jorawar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Followed
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.555/2005
Vikram Singh Yadav
State of Rajasthan, through Secretary, Department of Education
The District Education Officer, Primary Education, Alwar
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
