Allowed

Sudhir Kumar Yadav S/O Shri Balbir Singh Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Jan 2024CW/477/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Bench allowed the writ petition, directing respondents to grant service benefits and consequential benefits to the petitioner, considering his initial appointment date as 26.03.1997, by relying on a coordinate bench precedent.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed; respondents directed to allow service benefits and consequential benefits considering initial appointment on 26.03.1997.

Sudhir Kumar Yadav S/O Shri Balbir Singh Yadav Vs… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:2268]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 477/2023

¶4

Sudhir Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Balbir Singh Yadav, Aged About 48 Years, Presently Residing At Vill Vijaysinghpura, Teh Neemrana, Majri Kalan, Alwar, Rajasthan-301703.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶8

The District Education Officer, Primary Education, Alwar.

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Mahi Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. C.L. Saini, AAG with Ms. Shrejna Shresth

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶12

Judgment / Order

¶13

12/01/2024

¶14

Mr.C.L. Saini, AAG puts in appearance on behalf of both the respondents. Hence, service upon both the respondents is complete.

¶15

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case of Jorawar Singh Vs.

¶16

State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.555/2005) , decided on 07.11.2006.

¶17

Counsel for the respondent-State admits that yes, the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed in case of Jorawar Singh (supra) and this petition may

¶18

[2024:RJ-JP:2268] (2 of 2)

¶19

[CW-477/2023]

¶20

also be disposed in same terms and directions as given in case of Jorawar Singh (supra) .

¶21

Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed off with the directions to the respondents to allow the service benefits to the petitioner by considering the date of initial appointment in the Government service i.e. 26.03.1997 and the petitioner would been titled for consequential benefits, including the selection scale etc.

¶22

Since the main petition has been disposed of, all pending application/s, if any, also stand disposed.

¶23

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶24

ARTI SHARMA /341

Sudhir Kumar Yadav S/O Shri Balbir Singh Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhir Kumar Yadav S/O Shri Balbir Singh Yadav v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanwar Mal Yadav Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Hoshiyar Singh S/O Shri Ramji Lal Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Shashikant Arya S/O Shri Bhag Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Vikram Singh Yadav S/O Shri Kaluram Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Arun Prakash Sharma Son of Shri Subedar Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Amiri Lal Son of Shri Kishan Lal Vs State of Rajasthan