Disposed

Society Affiliated to Rural Development for Health and Agriculture v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Jan 2024CW/560/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, petitioner sought direction for expeditie approval of new medical courses. Court directed State and Respondents to decide pending application within three months post-inspection, ensuring formalities were met.

What did the court decide?

Direct respondents to decide petitioner's application pending followed by three months timeframe after inspection and completion of formalities.

Society Affiliated to Rural Development for Health… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:2678]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 560/2024

¶4

Society Affiliated To Rural Development For Health And Agriculture, Office- Mahesh Nursing Home Deoli, Tehsil Deoli, District Tonk, Through Its Secretary Dr. Mahesh Jindal S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Jindal Aged About 73 Years, Resident Of- Mahesh Nursing Home Deoli, Tehsil Deoli, District Tonk (Raj.)

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Medical And Health And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶8

Rajasthan Para- Medical Council, Through Its Registrar, C- 7 (A) Sultan House, Sjs Highway, Bani Park, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶9

Society Of Private Para- Medical Institutions, Through Its President Having Its Office At 144, Kamla Nehru Nagar, Jodhpur.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Munesh Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) :

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

¶13

Judgment

¶14

17/01/2024

¶15

Counsel submits that the application filed by the petitioner, seeking approval / grant for undertaking Diploma in Medical Laboratory Technology Course with 50 seats and Diploma in Radiation Technology Course with 50 seats in the academic session 2023-24, is still pending before the respondents for adjudication. Counsel submits that the said application has not been decided by the respondents for the reasons best known to

¶16

[2024:RJ-JP:2678] (2 of 2)

¶17

[CW-560/2024]

¶18

them. Counsel submits that the respondents be directed to decide the aforesaid application expeditiously, as early as possible, within a time frame.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid arguments of the petitioner and looking to the fact that the application filed by the petitioner is still pending for adjudication before the respondents, this Court deem it just and proper to dispose of this petition with direction to the respondents to decide the application (pending if any) expeditiously, as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order after conducting necessary inspection and subject to the condition that the petitioner institution has completed all the required formalities.

¶20

Stay application and all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

¶21

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

¶22

VIKAS/50

Society Affiliated to Rural Development for Health and Agriculture v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Society Affiliated to Rural Development for Health and Agriculture v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sms College of Nursing Vs State of Rajasthan

Chunni Lal S/O Shri Puraram Vs Jaipur Development Authority

Sant Kumar Purohit Vs Khayali Ram and Ors.

Rajendra Prasad Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Nani Devi Wife of Shri Shankar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Lalita Devi Dignostic Private Limited Vs the State of Rajasthan